Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text
What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal? The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board. Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org<http://internetgovernance.org/>
Thanks Milton. Perhaps we should use the language used by Fiona Alexander, as follows, instead of "for legal reasons".... Here's what she said in her email to us: "Consistent with procurement rules, ICANN must be the party that formally submits the transition proposal to NTIA." Also, a separate comment, we have one Board Liaison (Kuo-wei Wu) and one Staff Liaison (Elise Gerich), not two Board liaisons. Thanks, Keith From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:27 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal? The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board. Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org<http://internetgovernance.org/>
I agree it is preferable to use the exact language coming from NTIA: not less, but certainly not more. Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Keith Drazek" <kdrazek@verisign.com> À: internal-cg@icann.org Envoyé: Vendredi 17 Octobre 2014 15:41:31 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text Thanks Milton. Perhaps we should use the language used by Fiona Alexander, as follows, instead of “for legal reasons”…. Here’s what she said in her email to us: “Consistent with procurement rules, ICANN must be the party that formally submits the transition proposal to NTIA.” Also, a separate comment, we have one Board Liaison (Kuo-wei Wu) and one Staff Liaison (Elise Gerich), not two Board liaisons. Thanks, Keith From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:27 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal? The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board. Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Keith: Yes, agree, "consistent with procurement rules" is more precise than "legal reasons." Paul:
I suggested today to mention specifically that ICANN (board or staff) is
able and expected to contribute to the ICG processes with the same
rights as other community members. Was that agreed?
Yes.
We could also add that when the ICG submits its final proposal to ICANN,
this will be released to the general public, and NTIA as well. (include this
here or elsewhere)
I see no need for that in this question, as it does not relate directly to the role of the ICANN board, which is what the question is about. From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:42 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text Thanks Milton. Perhaps we should use the language used by Fiona Alexander, as follows, instead of "for legal reasons".... Here's what she said in her email to us: "Consistent with procurement rules, ICANN must be the party that formally submits the transition proposal to NTIA." Also, a separate comment, we have one Board Liaison (Kuo-wei Wu) and one Staff Liaison (Elise Gerich), not two Board liaisons. Thanks, Keith From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:27 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org<mailto:internal-cg@icann.org> Subject: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal? The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board. Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org<http://internetgovernance.org/>
@Keith: yes, "consistent with procurement rules" rather than "legal reasons". Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu> À: internal-cg@icann.org Envoyé: Vendredi 17 Octobre 2014 16:44:55 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text Keith: Yes, agree, “consistent with procurement rules” is more precise than “legal reasons.” Paul:
I suggested today to mention specifically that ICANN (board or staff) is
able and expected to contribute to the ICG processes with the same
rights as other community members. Was that agreed?
Yes.
We could also add that when the ICG submits its final proposal to ICANN,
this will be released to the general public, and NTIA as well. (include this
here or elsewhere)
I see no need for that in this question, as it does not relate directly to the role of the ICANN board, which is what the question is about. From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:42 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text Thanks Milton. Perhaps we should use the language used by Fiona Alexander, as follows, instead of “for legal reasons”…. Here’s what she said in her email to us: “Consistent with procurement rules, ICANN must be the party that formally submits the transition proposal to NTIA.” Also, a separate comment, we have one Board Liaison (Kuo-wei Wu) and one Staff Liaison (Elise Gerich), not two Board liaisons. Thanks, Keith From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [ mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org ] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:27 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal? The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board. Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
+1 @ Jean-Jacques, .. Paul 'on making the final proposal public including releasing it to NTIA'. Mary Uduma On Friday, October 17, 2014 4:56 PM, "Subrenat, Jean-Jacques" <jjs@dyalog.net> wrote: @Keith: yes, "consistent with procurement rules" rather than "legal reasons". Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu> À: internal-cg@icann.org Envoyé: Vendredi 17 Octobre 2014 16:44:55 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text Keith: Yes, agree, “consistent with procurement rules” is more precise than “legal reasons.” Paul:
I suggested today to mention specifically that ICANN (board or staff) is
able and expected to contribute to the ICG processes with the same
rights as other community members. Was that agreed?
Yes.
We could also add that when the ICG submits its final proposal to ICANN,
this will be released to the general public, and NTIA as well. (include this
here or elsewhere)
I see no need for that in this question, as it does not relate directly to the role of the ICANN board, which is what the question is about. From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:42 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text Thanks Milton. Perhaps we should use the language used by Fiona Alexander, as follows, instead of “for legal reasons”…. Here’s what she said in her email to us: “Consistent with procurement rules, ICANN must be the party that formally submits the transition proposal to NTIA.” Also, a separate comment, we have one Board Liaison (Kuo-wei Wu) and one Staff Liaison (Elise Gerich), not two Board liaisons. Thanks, Keith From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [ mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org ] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:27 PM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: [Internal-cg] Q14 (ICANN board) proposed text What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal? The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board. Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
I suggested today to mention specifically that ICANN (board or staff) is able and expected to contribute to the ICG processes with the same rights as other community members. Was that agreed? We could also add that when the ICG submits its final proposal to ICANN, this will be released to the general public, and NTIA as well. (include this here or elsewhere) thanks, ________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC <dg@apnic.net> http://www.apnic.net +61 7 3858 3100 On 18 Oct 2014, at 8:27 am, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
What is the role of the ICANN board in preparing the proposal?
The ICG is independent of the ICANN board. The board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons, who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the board informed about our deliberations. The board is not authorized to modify or approve the ICG's proposal, but for legal reasons, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN board.
Milton L Mueller Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/ Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (5)
-
Drazek, Keith -
Mary Uduma -
Milton L Mueller -
Paul Wilson -
Subrenat, Jean-Jacques