Comments received on icg-forum
Hi All, Please find the links to the comments received on the icg-forum on 4 Feb 2015 below: - Comments on ICG evaluations of numbers proposal: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00026.html - Comments on evaluations of protocol parameters response: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00027.html Best Regards, Jennifer ICG Secretariat
Dear All, Richard raised a point of principle which must be carefully examined. He qualified Milton,s evaluation factually correct. We need to discuss who would be the most neutraland impartial to evaluate. In a legal framework , one can not be party to a given judgement and on the other hand ACTS AS JUDGE. That concept does not work at all.... Kavouss 2015-02-05 5:26 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen@icgsec.asia>:
Hi All,
Please find the links to the comments received on the icg-forum on 4 Feb 2015 below:
- Comments on ICG evaluations of numbers proposal: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00026.html
- Comments on evaluations of protocol parameters response: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00027.html
Best Regards,
Jennifer
ICG Secretariat
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (2)
-
Jennifer Chung -
Kavouss Arasteh