Chuck, the plan is to offer the IANA employees to transfer to PTI or apply to other jobs within ICANN.  Obviously, we cannot force employees to work for PTI we can only hire replacements if they decide not to move. 

So regardless, all the IANA employees will be working for PTI at the latest 36 months after the transition.  I hope this clarifies the plan, please let me know if you have any questions, thanks


--
Best,
Akram

On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:

The following issue was raised on the RySG list:  “The tricky part here is that current ICANN employees will be offered employment by PTI, but can refuse it and keep being employed by ICANN and seconded to PTI, leaving the new hires the only PTI employees.”

 

Am I correct in assuming that this would not be allowed? 

 

Chuck

 

From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Yuko Green
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:06 PM
To: iotf@icann.org
Subject: [IOTF] Revised PTI staffing rationale

 

Dear members of IOTF,

 

Attached, please find the revised PTI staffing rationale that reflects the discussion from the last IOTF call #13. We welcome any feedback you may have.

 

Regards,

 

Yuko Green

Strategic Programs Manager

Global Domains Division

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 

Direct Line:  +1 310 578 8693

Mobile: +1 310 745 1517

E-mail:  yuko.green@icann.org

www.icann.org

 

_______________________________________________
IOTF mailing list
IOTF@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf