Russ,

 

In the administration of the IANA Naming Function, we receive confidential government and business documents.  There is an expectation from those customers of the IANA Naming Service that these documents are not published or redistributed. 

 

Best,

— Elise

 

From: <iotf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 8:46 AM
To: Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org>
Cc: "iotf@icann.org" <iotf@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [IOTF] Schedule A of the ICANN-PTI Services Agreement

 

Sidley is asking for a confidentiality clause to be added.  This implies that there is confidential information presently held by ICANN that needs to be transferred to PTI and the returned to ICANN at the end of the series agreement.I expect PTI to operate in an open and transparent manner.  Other than personnel information, I cannot imagine what confidential information this might cover, and that does not seem to be the kind of information that would go back to ICANN.  So, I am not sure what this is intended to protect.

 

Russ

 

  

On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:04 AM, Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org> wrote:



Dear IOTF members,

 

During today’s CWG meeting #88 (18 August at 06:00 UTC), it was requested by CWG and Sidley that IOTF review the Schedule A of the attached ICANN-PTI Services Agreement. As such, I am sending you the Services Agreement as well as Sidley’s notes about the Agreement.

 

Today’s CWG call recording where the request was made can be found here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p6fvs9tegl2/

 

Please also note that the intention is to re-discuss this Services Agreement during the next CWG call on 25 August at 14:00 UTC.

 

Regards,

 

Yuko Green

Strategic Programs Manager

Global Domains Division

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 

Direct Line:  +1 310 578 8693

Mobile: +1 310 745 1517