Jeff,

That is a potential slot for face-to-face meetings of the various Chartering Organizations that would need a "live" meeting in order to approve the final report. GAC and ccNSO are most likely to need this. Since the GNSO Council is used to conducting business remotely between ICANN meetings, my gut reaction is that it's less likely the GNSO (or some subpart, such as the Council) will be brought together in a live meeting.

This "face-to-face" was being referred to as a potential "Intersessional" in Dublin. Given the limited nature of the meeting, it was re-christened a "face-to-face".

Greg

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> wrote:

Greg,

What is the Chartering Org face to face referenced in the timeline?

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA

1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600

Mclean, VA 22102, United States

E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com

T: +1.703.635.7514

M: +1.202.549.5079

@Jintlaw

From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:52 AM
To: IPC-GNSO <ipc-gnso@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Updated Timeline for CCWG-Accountability

This time, with the attachment.

Greg

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

All,

Attached please find the latest version of the timeline for the completion of the CCWG's work.

We should consider how we will work within these timelines, both with regard to providing public comments and with regard to our role in the Chartering Organization approval process within the GNSO.

Greg