Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs
Dear IPC Members, Volunteers needed. Please see below. Kind regards, Chantelle _________ https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's Charter [PDF, 510 KB] on 9 March 2016. What This Team Will Do 1. Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the approved charter [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to the UDRP Final Issue Report [PDF, 2.69 MB], the RPM Staff Paper [PDF 2.5 MB], and the Preliminary Issue Report for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. 2. Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the WG's wiki. The PDP WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer: Individual Members – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI). Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the GNSO Secretariat. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form or send the Word document [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: The Final Issue Report [PDF, 1 MB] The approved charter [PDF, 510 KB] Materials available at the Working Group's online wiki workspace Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS); the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs). Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that UDRP Final Issue Report [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised RPM Staff Paper [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for public comment on 9 October 2015. A Final Issue Report [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the PDP WG [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 9 March 2016, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage for GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs and the Working Group's online wiki workspace, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
Hi, I have just expressed my interest to join as a member. Best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 21 mars 2016 22:42:47 +01:00, skrev Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>:
Dear IPC Members,
Volunteers needed. Please see below.
Kind regards, Chantelle
_________
<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en> Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group'sCharter <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf>[PDF, 510 KB] on9 March 2016 <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016>. What This Team Will Do 1.Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in theapproved charter <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf>[PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to theUDRP Final Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf>[PDF, 2.69 MB], theRPM Staff Paper <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf>[PDF 2.5 MB], and thePreliminary Issue Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en>for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. 2.Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on theWG's wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>. The PDP WG is expected to follow theGNSO Working Group Guidelines <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf>[PDF, 350 KB] as well as theGNSO PDP Manual <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16feb16-en.pdf>[PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer:
* Individual Members– anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs>). * Mailing list observers– for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing theGNSO Secretariat <gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in thesign up form <http://goo.gl/forms/sMAaNujZdB>or send theWord document <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58729953/Review%20of%20all%20Rights%20Protection%20Mechanisms%20in%20all%20gTLDs%20PDP%5B1%5D.docx?version=2&modificationDate=1458138472316&api=v2>[DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to theGNSO Secretariat <gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG:
* TheFinal Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf>[PDF, 1 MB] * Theapproved charter <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf>[PDF, 510 KB] * Materials available at the Working Group'sonline wiki workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...> Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, theUniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/help/dndr/udrp-en>is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: theUniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/urs-2014-01-09-en>; theTrademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse>and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; andthe Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/tm-pddrp-2013-10-31-en>. Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in thatUDRP Final Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf>[PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revisedRPM Staff Paper <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf>[PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a newPreliminary Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-prelim-issue-09oct15-en.pdf>[PDF, 1.4 MB] was published forpublic comment <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en>on 9 October 2015. AFinal Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf>[PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for thePDP WG <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf>[PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on9 March 2016 <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016>, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage forGNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rpm>and theWorking Group's online wiki workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat<gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/> _______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso>
I did the same (and selected IPC under “affiliation” – though I do not purport to represent the IPC as a member of the WG). Sincerely yours, Douglas M. Isenberg Attorney at Law <http://www.gigalaw.com/> “When your brand is on the line, The GigaLaw Firm protects your brand online.” Learn more: <http://www.gigalaw.com/> www.GigaLaw.com From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Petter Rindforth Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 6:11 PM To: Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org> Cc: ipc-gnso@icann.org Subject: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Hi, I have just expressed my interest to join as a member. Best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu <mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu> www.fenixlegal.eu <http://www.fenixlegal.eu> NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu <http://www.fenixlegal.eu> Thank you 21 mars 2016 22:42:47 +01:00, skrev Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org <mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org> >: Dear IPC Members, Volunteers needed. Please see below. Kind regards, Chantelle _________ https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> Charter [PDF, 510 KB] on <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016> 9 March 2016. What This Team Will Do 1. Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf> approved charter [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to the <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf> UDRP Final Issue Report [PDF, 2.69 MB], the <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf> RPM Staff Paper [PDF 2.5 MB], and the <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en> Preliminary Issue Report for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. 2. Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...> WG's wiki. The PDP WG is expected to follow the <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf> GNSO Working Group Guidelines [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16feb16-en.pdf> GNSO PDP Manual [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer: * Individual Members – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest ( <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs> SOI). * Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers> GNSO Secretariat. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the <http://goo.gl/forms/sMAaNujZdB> sign up form or send the <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58729953/Review%20of%20all%...> Word document [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers> GNSO Secretariat. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: * The <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf> Final Issue Report [PDF, 1 MB] * The <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> approved charter [PDF, 510 KB] * Materials available at the Working Group's <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...> online wiki workspace Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/help/dndr/udrp-en> Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/urs-2014-01-09-en> Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS); the <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse> Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/tm-pddrp-2013-10-31-en> the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs). Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf> UDRP Final Issue Report [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf> RPM Staff Paper [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a new <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-prelim-issue-09oct15-en.pdf> Preliminary Issue Report [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en> public comment on 9 October 2015. A <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf> Final Issue Report [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> PDP WG [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016> 9 March 2016, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage for <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rpm> GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs and the <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...> Working Group's online wiki workspace, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group _____ Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/> _______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org <mailto:IPC-GNSO@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso
Dear Chantelle, Holly Lance and I will participate. Jim James L. Bikoff<http://www.sgrlaw.com/attorneys/profiles/bikoff-james/> | Attorney at Law 202-263-4341 phone 202-263-4329 fax www.sgrlaw.com<http://www.sgrlaw.com> jbikoff@sgrlaw.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgrlaw.com> 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20007 [cid:image6fc7df.JPG@4a63c59f.42b5a688]<http://www.sgrlaw.com> Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chantelle Doerksen Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:43 PM To: ipc-gnso@icann.org Subject: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Dear IPC Members, Volunteers needed. Please see below. Kind regards, Chantelle _________ https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's Charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 510 KB] on 9 March 2016<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016>. What This Team Will Do Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the approved charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf> [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to the UDRP Final Issue Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf> [PDF, 2.69 MB], the RPM Staff Paper<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf> [PDF 2.5 MB], and the Preliminary Issue Report<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en> for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the WG's wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>. The PDP WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf> [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer: * Individual Members – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs>). * Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form<http://goo.gl/forms/sMAaNujZdB> or send the Word document<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58729953/Review%20of%20all%...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: * The Final Issue Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf> [PDF, 1 MB] * The approved charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 510 KB] * Materials available at the Working Group's online wiki workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...> Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/help/dndr/udrp-en> is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS)<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/urs-2014-01-09-en>; the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH)<https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse> and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs)<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/tm-pddrp-2013-10-31-en>. Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that UDRP Final Issue Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf> [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised RPM Staff Paper<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf> [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-prelim-issue-09oct15-en.pdf> [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for public comment<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en> on 9 October 2015. A Final Issue Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf> [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the PDP WG<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 9 March 2016<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016>, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage for GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rpm> and the Working Group's online wiki workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group ________________________________ Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/> ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form <http://goo.gl/forms/sMAaNujZdB> or send the Word document <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58729953/Review%20of%20all%...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat <gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Bikoff, James <jbikoff@sgrlaw.com> wrote:
Dear Chantelle,
Holly Lance and I will participate.
Jim
James L. Bikoff <http://www.sgrlaw.com/attorneys/profiles/bikoff-james/> | Attorney at Law
202-263-4341 *phone* 202-263-4329 *fax*
*www.sgrlaw.com <http://www.sgrlaw.com> jbikoff@sgrlaw.com <jbikoff@sgrlaw.com>*
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20007
<http://www.sgrlaw.com> Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP
*From:* ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Chantelle Doerksen *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2016 5:43 PM *To:* ipc-gnso@icann.org *Subject:* [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs
Dear IPC Members,
Volunteers needed. Please see below.
Kind regards,
Chantelle
_________
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief
The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's Charter <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 510 KB] on 9 March 2016 <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016> . What This Team Will Do
*Conduct the PDP in two phases*
This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the approved charter <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf> [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).
At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals.
In public comments to the UDRP Final Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf> [PDF, 2.69 MB], the RPM Staff Paper <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf> [PDF 2.5 MB], and the Preliminary Issue Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en> for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group.
*Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts*
The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes.
At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work
ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the WG's wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>. The PDP WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf> [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate
There are two ways to volunteer:
- *Individual Members* – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs>). - *Mailing list observers* – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the GNSO Secretariat <gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>.
In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join
If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form <http://goo.gl/forms/sMAaNujZdB> or send the Word document <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58729953/Review%20of%20all%...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat <gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>.
All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. *Next steps*
The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. *Further information and preparation*
For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG:
- The Final Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf> [PDF, 1 MB] - The approved charter <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 510 KB] - Materials available at the Working Group's online wiki workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>
*Background*
The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/help/dndr/udrp-en> is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/urs-2014-01-09-en>; the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse> and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/tm-pddrp-2013-10-31-en>. Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that UDRP Final Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/udrp/udrp-final-issue-report-03oct11-en.pdf> [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised RPM Staff Paper <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf> [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created.
In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-prelim-issue-09oct15-en.pdf> [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for public comment <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en> on 9 October 2015. A Final Issue Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/rpm-final-issue-11jan16-en.pdf> [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the PDP WG <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf> [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 9 March 2016 <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+9+March+2016>, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP.
More information can be found on the activities webpage for GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rpm> and the Working Group's online wiki workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/Review+of+all+Rights+Protec...>, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations.
As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group ------------------------------
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat *gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org <gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>* *http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>*
------------------------------ Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
_______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso
I have submitted my interest in joining as a member. Best. David David Einhorn Partner ________________________________ [cid:image010.jpg@01D184ED.4D4E0790] 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111-0100 T 212.589.4644 deinhorn@bakerlaw.com<mailto:deinhorn@bakerlaw.com> bakerlaw.com<http://www.bakerlaw.com/> [cid:image011.jpg@01D184ED.4D4E0790]<http://www.bakerlaw.com/FindLawyers.aspx?Lookup_By_Email=deinhorn>[cid:image012.jpg@01D184ED.4D4E0790]<http://www.bakerlaw.com/vcards/deinhorn.vcf> [cid:image013.jpg@01D184ED.4D4E0790]<http://www.bakerlaw100.com/> From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:43 PM To: Bikoff, James Cc: ipc-gnso@icann.org Subject: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_forms_sMAaNujZdB&...> or send the Word document<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dow...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Bikoff, James <jbikoff@sgrlaw.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgrlaw.com>> wrote: Dear Chantelle, Holly Lance and I will participate. Jim James L. Bikoff<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com_attorneys...> | Attorney at Law 202-263-4341<tel:202-263-4341> phone 202-263-4329<tel:202-263-4329> fax www.sgrlaw.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com&d=CwMFaQ&...> jbikoff@sgrlaw.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgrlaw.com> 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20007 [cid:image009.jpg@01D184ED.3DECCDE0]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com&d=CwMFaQ&...> Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Chantelle Doerksen Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:43 PM To: ipc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso@icann.org> Subject: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Dear IPC Members, Volunteers needed. Please see below. Kind regards, Chantelle _________ https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_news_announcement-2D2016-2D03-2D21-2Den&d=CwMFaQ&c=tlFs99Fl3Rlo51LXUBQcug&r=KN498a_LSuJMu8ySqEIhZm3hvNeb2HvakYrj84uZ-JY&m=QvQqGIeWaYh4HjSpOYQRbQGOOzV7rCHugfaCFyZP4fw&s=sWj6Y2-eGl5cPh4XMfwwCNlFWIB2DoBxwo8PVQLCxIY&e=> Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's Charter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 510 KB] on 9 March 2016<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>. What This Team Will Do Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the approved charter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to the UDRP Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 2.69 MB], the RPM Staff Paper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_re...> [PDF 2.5 MB], and the Preliminary Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D...> for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the WG's wiki<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>. The PDP WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counci...> [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counci...> [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer: * Individual Members – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>). * Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_forms_sMAaNujZdB&...> or send the Word document<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dow...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: * The Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 1 MB] * The approved charter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 510 KB] * Materials available at the Working Group's online wiki workspace<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...> is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...>; the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_a...> and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...>. Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that UDRP Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised RPM Staff Paper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_re...> [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for public comment<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D...> on 9 October 2015. A Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the PDP WG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 9 March 2016<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage for GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-...> and the Working Group's online wiki workspace<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group ________________________________ Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_&d=CwMFaQ&c=tlFs99Fl3Rlo51LXUBQcug&r=KN498a_LSuJMu8ySqEIhZm3hvNeb2HvakYrj84uZ-JY&m=QvQqGIeWaYh4HjSpOYQRbQGOOzV7rCHugfaCFyZP4fw&s=8IJOOpFbJn6lIXHBmNb3t1FVWvbt_7DJC88vdvd022c&e=> ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. _______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org<mailto:IPC-GNSO@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_ipc-2Dgnso&d=CwMFaQ&c=tlFs99Fl3Rlo51LXUBQcug&r=KN498a_LSuJMu8ySqEIhZm3hvNeb2HvakYrj84uZ-JY&m=QvQqGIeWaYh4HjSpOYQRbQGOOzV7rCHugfaCFyZP4fw&s=BcQJJUhSOHLtHHy-II4Yya23iUhgyYZGHDRTbiYitmU&e=> ________________________________ This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities. Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission.
I have submitted my interest in joining as a member. Regards, Hector Héctor Ariel Manoff Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen Viamonte 1145 10º Piso C1053ABW Buenos Aires República Argentina Te: (54-11) 4371-6100 Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365 E-mail: <mailto:amanoff@vmf.com.ar> amanoff@vmf.com.ar Web: <http://www.vmf.com.ar/> http://www.vmf.com.ar **************************************************************************************************************************************************** Esta comunicación tiene como destinatario a la persona o empresa a la cual está dirigida y puede contener información confidencial y reservada. Si el lector de este mensaje no es el destinatario o sus empleados o representantes, deberá proceder a reenviar el presente a su remitente. La distribución, diseminación o copiado de este mensaje podría constituir violación a la ley. Gracias. This email and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address. Thank you. **************************************************************************************************************************************************** De: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Einhorn, David A. Enviado el: miércoles, 23 de marzo de 2016 11:18 Para: Greg Shatan; Bikoff, James CC: ipc-gnso@icann.org Asunto: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs I have submitted my interest in joining as a member. Best. David David Einhorn Partner _____ 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111-0100 T 212.589.4644 <mailto:deinhorn@bakerlaw.com> deinhorn@bakerlaw.com <http://www.bakerlaw.com/> bakerlaw.com <http://www.bakerlaw.com/FindLawyers.aspx?Lookup_By_Email=deinhorn> <http://www.bakerlaw.com/vcards/deinhorn.vcf> <http://www.bakerlaw100.com/> From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:43 PM To: Bikoff, James Cc: ipc-gnso@icann.org Subject: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_forms_sMAaNujZdB&...> sign up form or send the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dow...> Word document [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers> GNSO Secretariat. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Bikoff, James <jbikoff@sgrlaw.com> wrote: Dear Chantelle, Holly Lance and I will participate. Jim <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com_attorneys...> James L. Bikoff | Attorney at Law 202-263-4341 phone 202-263-4329 fax <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com&d=CwMFaQ&...> www.sgrlaw.com <mailto:jbikoff@sgrlaw.com> jbikoff@sgrlaw.com 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20007 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com&d=CwMFaQ&...> Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chantelle Doerksen Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:43 PM To: ipc-gnso@icann.org Subject: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Dear IPC Members, Volunteers needed. Please see below. Kind regards, Chantelle _________ https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_news_anno...> Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> Charter [PDF, 510 KB] on <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> 9 March 2016. What This Team Will Do Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> approved charter [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> UDRP Final Issue Report [PDF, 2.69 MB], the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_re...> RPM Staff Paper [PDF 2.5 MB], and the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D...> Preliminary Issue Report for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> WG's wiki. The PDP WG is expected to follow the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counci...> GNSO Working Group Guidelines [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counci...> GNSO PDP Manual [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer: * Individual Members – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest ( <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> SOI). * Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers> GNSO Secretariat. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_forms_sMAaNujZdB&...> sign up form or send the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dow...> Word document [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers> GNSO Secretariat. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: * The <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> Final Issue Report [PDF, 1 MB] * The <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> approved charter [PDF, 510 KB] * Materials available at the Working Group's <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> online wiki workspace Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...> Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...> Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS); the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_a...> Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...> the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs). Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> UDRP Final Issue Report [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_re...> RPM Staff Paper [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a new <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> Preliminary Issue Report [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D...> public comment on 9 October 2015. A <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> Final Issue Report [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> PDP WG [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> 9 March 2016, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage for <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-...> GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs and the <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> Working Group's online wiki workspace, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group _____ Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_&d=CwMFaQ...> _____ Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. _______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...> _____ This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities. Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission.
I've submitted my request to join as a member, as well. Marina A. Lewis marina@dns-law.com<mailto:marina@dns-law.com> (510) 541-1906 On Mar 23, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Ariel Manoff <amanoff@vmf.com.ar<mailto:amanoff@vmf.com.ar>> wrote: I have submitted my interest in joining as a member. Regards, Hector Héctor Ariel Manoff Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen Viamonte 1145 10º Piso C1053ABW Buenos Aires República Argentina Te: (54-11) 4371-6100 Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365 E-mail: amanoff@vmf.com.ar<mailto:amanoff@vmf.com.ar> Web: http://www.vmf.com.ar<http://www.vmf.com.ar/> **************************************************************************************************************************************************** Esta comunicación tiene como destinatario a la persona o empresa a la cual está dirigida y puede contener información confidencial y reservada. Si el lector de este mensaje no es el destinatario o sus empleados o representantes, deberá proceder a reenviar el presente a su remitente. La distribución, diseminación o copiado de este mensaje podría constituir violación a la ley. Gracias. This email and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address. Thank you. **************************************************************************************************************************************************** De: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Einhorn, David A. Enviado el: miércoles, 23 de marzo de 2016 11:18 Para: Greg Shatan; Bikoff, James CC: ipc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso@icann.org> Asunto: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs I have submitted my interest in joining as a member. Best. David David Einhorn Partner ________________________________ <image001.jpg> 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111-0100 T 212.589.4644 deinhorn@bakerlaw.com<mailto:deinhorn@bakerlaw.com> bakerlaw.com<http://www.bakerlaw.com/> <image002.jpg><http://www.bakerlaw.com/FindLawyers.aspx?Lookup_By_Email=deinhorn><image003.jpg><http://www.bakerlaw.com/vcards/deinhorn.vcf> <image004.jpg><http://www.bakerlaw100.com/> From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:43 PM To: Bikoff, James Cc: ipc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso@icann.org> Subject: Re: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_forms_sMAaNujZdB&...> or send the Word document<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dow...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Bikoff, James <jbikoff@sgrlaw.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgrlaw.com>> wrote: Dear Chantelle, Holly Lance and I will participate. Jim James L. Bikoff<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com_attorneys...> | Attorney at Law 202-263-4341<tel:202-263-4341> phone 202-263-4329<tel:202-263-4329> fax www.sgrlaw.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com&d=CwMFaQ&...> jbikoff@sgrlaw.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgrlaw.com> 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20007 <image005.jpg><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sgrlaw.com&d=CwMFaQ&...> Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP From: ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Chantelle Doerksen Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:43 PM To: ipc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:ipc-gnso@icann.org> Subject: [IPC-GNSO] Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Dear IPC Members, Volunteers needed. Please see below. Kind regards, Chantelle _________ https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_news_announcement-2D2016-2D03-2D21-2Den&d=CwMFaQ&c=tlFs99Fl3Rlo51LXUBQcug&r=KN498a_LSuJMu8ySqEIhZm3hvNeb2HvakYrj84uZ-JY&m=QvQqGIeWaYh4HjSpOYQRbQGOOzV7rCHugfaCFyZP4fw&s=sWj6Y2-eGl5cPh4XMfwwCNlFWIB2DoBxwo8PVQLCxIY&e=> Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers for a new Working Group that will conduct a Policy Development Process (PDP) to Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs). The GNSO Council approved the PDP Working Group's Charter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 510 KB] on 9 March 2016<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>. What This Team Will Do Conduct the PDP in two phases This PDP Working Group is being chartered to conduct a review of all RPMs in all gTLDs in two phases as defined in the approved charter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 524 KB]: Phase One will focus on a review of all the RPMs that were developed for the New gTLD Program (i.e. the Trademark Clearinghouse and associated notification and sunrise mechanisms, the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure, and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures), and Phase Two will focus on a review of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). At a minimum, in each Phase of this PDP, the Working Group will be expected to first assess the effectiveness of the relevant RPM(s), for which it should seek the input of experienced online dispute resolution providers and other subject matter experts, as appropriate. The Working Group is also expected to look at the interplay between and complementary roles of each RPM in seeking to more fully understand their overall functioning and effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal is for the Working Group to consider the overarching issue as to whether or not all the RPMs collectively fulfill the purposes for which they were created, or whether additional policy recommendations are needed, including to clarify and unify the policy goals. In public comments to the UDRP Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 2.69 MB], the RPM Staff Paper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_re...> [PDF 2.5 MB], and the Preliminary Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D...> for this PDP, various community groups and participants had identified a number of issues that they considered appropriate for review in a PDP. As such, the Working Group is expected to consider these community suggestions, which have been listed in the Working Group Charter, with further modifications, additions and deletions to be determined by consensus of the Working Group. Coordinate its work with other parallel efforts The Working Group will monitor the progress of and, where appropriate, coordinate with, other ICANN groups that are working on topics that may overlap with or otherwise provide useful input to this PDP. These other efforts include the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team, the Trademark Clearinghouse Independent Review and the GNSO's PDP Working Group on New gTLDs Subsequent Procedures. In this regard, the GNSO Council directed that a GNSO community liaison be appointed by the two GNSO PDP Working Groups. Further, as the manager of the policy development process, the GNSO Council is to be kept informed about the various coordination efforts so that in case of conflict between these groups, the Council may take the appropriate action to align the different work processes. At the conclusion of Phase One of its work, the Working Group is expected to assess the need for modification to its Charter and, if appropriate, submit a request to the GNSO Council accordingly for the subsequent phase(s) of its work. How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP Working Group will be recorded and transcribed, and the recordings and transcriptions will be available to the public. The mailing list for the Working Group will be archived publicly. The group will collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work products and milestones will be documented on the WG's wiki<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>. The PDP WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counci...> [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_counci...> [PDF, 300 KB]. How to participate There are two ways to volunteer: * Individual Members – anyone interested can volunteer to join the PDP Working Group as a member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated that the Working Group will at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>). * Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in monitoring the Working Group's deliberations, it is possible to sign up as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not receive invitations to the meetings of the Working Group and will not have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP Working Group is expected to organize. How to Join If you are interested in joining the Working Group either as an individual participant or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_forms_sMAaNujZdB&...> or send the Word document<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dow...> [DOCX, 72 KB], filled in, to the GNSO Secretariat<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org?subject=Call%20for%20volunteers>. All members and observers will be listed on the PDP Working Group's wiki page. Next steps The GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the Working Group. it is anticipated that the Working Group will convene online for the first time in early April 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the Working Group's work plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. Further information and preparation For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of the PDP WG: * The Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 1 MB] * The approved charter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 510 KB] * Materials available at the Working Group's online wiki workspace<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> Background The question of who legally has rights to, or is the legitimate holder of, a domain name can be open to dispute. In relation to domain name disputes concerning the registration and use of legally protected trademarks, the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...> is the longest standing alternative dispute resolution procedure. As a result of the New gTLD Program, several new rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) were developed to mitigate potential risks and costs to trademark rights holders that could arise in the expansion of the gTLD namespace, which included certain safeguards to protect registrants who engage in legitimate uses of domain names: the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...>; the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_a...> and the associated availability through the TMCH of Sunrise periods and the Trademark Claims notification service; and the Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (PDDRPs)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...>. Prior to the launch of the New gTLD Program, on 3 October 2011 ICANN staff had published a Final Issue Report on the current state of the UDRP. The recommended course of action in that UDRP Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 2.69 MB] was not to initiate a PDP at the time, but to hold off launching any such PDP until after the new URS had been in operation for at least eighteen (18) months. In addition, the September 2015 revised RPM Staff Paper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_re...> [PDF 2.5 MB] had explicitly noted that some of the concerns identified by the community for consideration as part of a review of the RPMs might be appropriate topics for policy development work. The UDRP has not been subject to comprehensive review. There has also not been a full review of all the RPMs developed to date by ICANN, to consider whether or not they are collectively achieving the objectives for which they were created. In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for public comment<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D...> on 9 October 2015. A Final Issue Report<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues...> [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the PDP WG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts...> [PDF, 510 KB]. The final charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 9 March 2016<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>, enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to conduct this PDP. More information can be found on the activities webpage for GNSO PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-...> and the Working Group's online wiki workspace<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...>, which includes the charter, community input provided during the public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials to inform the Working Group's deliberations. As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, anyone interested in helping to shape the review of all RPMs in all gTLDs are encouraged to volunteer for this Working Group ________________________________ Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_&d=CwMFaQ&c=tlFs99Fl3Rlo51LXUBQcug&r=KN498a_LSuJMu8ySqEIhZm3hvNeb2HvakYrj84uZ-JY&m=QvQqGIeWaYh4HjSpOYQRbQGOOzV7rCHugfaCFyZP4fw&s=8IJOOpFbJn6lIXHBmNb3t1FVWvbt_7DJC88vdvd022c&e=> ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. _______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org<mailto:IPC-GNSO@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_ipc-2Dgnso&d=CwMFaQ&c=tlFs99Fl3Rlo51LXUBQcug&r=KN498a_LSuJMu8ySqEIhZm3hvNeb2HvakYrj84uZ-JY&m=QvQqGIeWaYh4HjSpOYQRbQGOOzV7rCHugfaCFyZP4fw&s=BcQJJUhSOHLtHHy-II4Yya23iUhgyYZGHDRTbiYitmU&e=> ________________________________ This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities. Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. _______________________________________________ IPC-GNSO mailing list IPC-GNSO@icann.org<mailto:IPC-GNSO@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso
participants (9)
-
Aleksandar Icokaev -
Ariel Manoff -
Bikoff, James -
Chantelle Doerksen -
Doug Isenberg -
Einhorn, David A. -
Greg Shatan -
Marina Lewis -
Petter Rindforth