July 2019 - IRT.RegDataPolicy

FAQ #7&8 Review
by Dennis Chang 13 Jul '19

13 Jul '19

Dear IRT, FAQs #7 and #8 have been are provided for IRT review and added to the IRT Task list as: 24 Review FAQ #7 & 8<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FeVSwVdmss-hGCheyjOyPsSF5NhcRFKq135X8sE…> 20190727 Beth, FAQ#8 about the “definition” should be of particular interest to you. 21 Review Definitions in the Main policy language document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vERmZ21Rq3jI-taPmc2W2HVW05DIFg6WmtG_StR…> 20190710 We’ve discussed this at the beginning of our last IRT meeting. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

1 0

Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Definitions
by Dennis Chang 10 Jul '19

10 Jul '19

Marc, The definitions define terms for purposes of this Policy only. They are intended to be consistent with how the words are used in the RA/RAA and other policies where applicable but don’t modify defined terms in other agreements/policies. Thanks Dennis Chang From: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson(a)verisign.com> Date: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 1:46 PM To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org>, "IRT.regdatapolicy(a)icann.org" <IRT.regdatapolicy(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Definitions Dennis and IPT/IRT, I have some feedback on the definitions in the draft Registration Data Policy google document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vERmZ21Rq3jI-taPmc2W2HVW05DIFg6WmtG_StR… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>) but before I can provide that I need to better understand the context of the definitions. Are the definitions intended solely for use as reference to someone reading the Registration Data Policy (as the glossary was in the phase 1 recommendations) or are they intended to have broader meaning outside these policy recommendations applicable to other policies and procedures? Obviously the answer to that has pretty significant implications so I want to make sure I’m clear on the intent. Best, Marc

2 1

Definitions
by Anderson, Marc 09 Jul '19

09 Jul '19

Dennis and IPT/IRT, I have some feedback on the definitions in the draft Registration Data Policy google document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vERmZ21Rq3jI-taPmc2W2HVW05DIFg6WmtG_StR…) but before I can provide that I need to better understand the context of the definitions. Are the definitions intended solely for use as reference to someone reading the Registration Data Policy (as the glossary was in the phase 1 recommendations) or are they intended to have broader meaning outside these policy recommendations applicable to other policies and procedures? Obviously the answer to that has pretty significant implications so I want to make sure I'm clear on the intent. Best, Marc

1 0

Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Scope 1.1 - 1.5 Review
by Dennis Chang 09 Jul '19

09 Jul '19

Dear IRT, The scope section has been revised to add one more item and therefore the due date has been revised. 23 Review Scope 1.2 to 1.5 in main policy document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vERmZ21Rq3jI-taPmc2W2HVW05DIFg6WmtG_StR…> 20190723 Please note the IRT meeting tomorrow on 10 July 2019 will focus on tasks due by 9 July 2019. This means Recommendations Analysis for 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and FAQs 2, 3, and 4. If time allows, we can open discussion for Tasks not yet due. In the meanwhile, thank you all for your contribution to the collaborative documents. Thanks Dennis Chang From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 11:39 AM To: "IRT.regdatapolicy(a)icann.org" <IRT.regdatapolicy(a)icann.org> Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Scope 1.1 - 1.4 Review Dear IRT, Scope sections 1.2 to 1.4 have been added to the main policy language document for your review. Added to the IRT task list as 23 Review Scope 1.2 to 1.4 in main policy document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vERmZ21Rq3jI-taPmc2W2HVW05DIFg6WmtG_StR…> 20190719 Per our discussion at the last IRT meeting, this is the document we will use to merge all pieces of policy language for the public comment. Therefore, the we will be copying over clean versions of Rec 5, Rec, 7 … to this document as we go. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

1 0

Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec 10, 11, 13 & 6 Analysis review
by Dennis Chang 08 Jul '19

08 Jul '19

Dear IRT, Recommendation 10, 11, 13, and 6 Analysis is open for IRT Review and added to the Task List as: 22 Review Recommendation 10, 11, 13 & 6 Analysis: Publication<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OuZT7xL5wuV1ynVmpVNxFycU93gvPlvbzx_g9lX…> 20190722 The policy language is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OuZT7xL5wuV1ynVmpVNxFycU93gvPlvbzx_g9lX… Please refer to the updated data elements matrix when reviewing the policy language. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1c235iuKWX5-lKufkR67pPF0OEf-Fw3W94WP… — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

1 0

Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] IRT.Rec5review - Langauge by Language
by Dennis Chang 05 Jul '19

05 Jul '19

Thanks Betty and Julie for the correction. Much appreciated. Understood and resolved the comment. Thanks Dennis Chang From: "Julie LERUS (Google Docs)" <comments-noreply(a)docs.google.com> Reply-To: Reply <d+AORGpRck8MOg5Qo70m9ZYRt79WVKjQUzwjO13loeI4AwD-6XB1XrzEil5AwUOuDc8xzUR3Q4_7YVCOrA9e76tK0YzjWhmkQcZZlmML0a1p5MCao9RLrZAKU(a)docs.google.com> Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 9:26 PM To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] IRT.Rec5review - Langauge by Language Julie LERUS replied to a comment in IRT.Rec5review [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> [https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/mediatype/icon_1_document_x64.p…] IRT.Rec5review [docs.google.com] Langauge. [User profile picture betty fausta] betty fausta Langauge by Language [User profile picture Dennis Chang] Dennis Chang please clarify this comment [User profile picture Julie LERUS] Julie LERUSNew I corrected langauge by language... u copy the same error below. just a little remarks about your comments Open [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA You have received this email because you are a participant in this thread.Change what Google Docs sends you. [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>You can reply to this email to reply to the discussion. [https://www.gstatic.com/images/branding/googlelogo/2x/googlelogo_tm_black54…]

1 0

Scope 1.1 - 1.4 Review
by Dennis Chang 03 Jul '19

03 Jul '19

Dear IRT, Scope sections 1.2 to 1.4 have been added to the main policy language document for your review. Added to the IRT task list as 23 Review Scope 1.2 to 1.4 in main policy document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vERmZ21Rq3jI-taPmc2W2HVW05DIFg6WmtG_StR…> 20190719 Per our discussion at the last IRT meeting, this is the document we will use to merge all pieces of policy language for the public comment. Therefore, the we will be copying over clean versions of Rec 5, Rec, 7 … to this document as we go. — Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Services & Engagement Program Director Telephone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

1 0

[IRT Process: IRT may resolve their own comments] FW: [Ext] IRT.Rec7&8.3 - These fields are yellow/optional in R...
by Dennis Chang 03 Jul '19

03 Jul '19

Dear IRT, Below you can see an example of IRT members collaborating using comments. Question asked; answer provided; comment resolved. This has been working well and I think probably most efficient. From here on out, IRT members may and should resolve their own comments if they wish. Otherwise, staff will be resolving the comments as needed while documenting them along the way for reference. Thank you all for keeping up with the reviews to guide our policy implementation. Dennis Chang From: "Sarah Wyld (Google Docs)" <comments-noreply(a)docs.google.com> Reply-To: Reply <d+AORGpRd65FZ21OOojQ40e1uP6gUr1kLB3C4iPJMhFIMug6mV_HUAbUAB9X0ijI52b1G-fn4vuWu4rYGsue9xMjXMaTv4VPwNz7fiRhTc0nr06_iwfBCH5pE(a)docs.google.com> Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 7:48 AM To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] IRT.Rec7&8.3 - These fields are yellow/optional in R... Sarah Wyld replied to a comment in IRT.Rec7&8.3 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_a_tuco…> [https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/mediatype/icon_1_document_x64.p…] IRT.Rec7&8.3 [docs.google.com] 6.5.4 Tech Name 6.5.5 Tech Phone 6.5.6 Tech Email [User profile picture Sarah Wyld] Sarah Wyld These fields are yellow/optional in Rec 8, why are they a MUST here? Should they not be a MAY? [User profile picture Amr Elsadr] Amr Elsadr I might be mistaken (please correct me if I am), but my understanding is that the yellow (optional) color-code is the the processing activity of collection of this data. However, if the data is collected, then its transfer to a DEA is required, provided that the requirements in recommendations 8.1 and 8.2 are fulfilled. [User profile picture Dennis Chang] Dennis Chang +1 Amr [User profile picture Sarah Wyld] Sarah WyldNew Understood, thanks Amr [User profile picture Sarah Wyld] Sarah WyldNew Marked as resolved Open [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_a_tuco…> Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA You have received this email because you are a participant in this thread.Change what Google Docs sends you. [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>You can reply to this email to reply to the discussion. [https://www.gstatic.com/images/branding/googlelogo/2x/googlelogo_tm_black54…]

1 0