The RySG has reviewed ICANN’s proposed language (as linked
below) and supports moving it forward to public comments. We
aren’t able to comment on the edits proposed today as there
wasn’t time to reconvene the RySG to discuss.
Dear Isabelle, dear IRT
Members,
We discussed the state of play
and the latest text in the GAC small team on registration
data and we find the work of the IRT is going in the right
direction. I am conveying the appreciation of the whole team
for the good cooperation in the IRT group.
Before the text is finalised
and sent for public comment,
we would propose that one outstanding element be
addressed concerning the institutionalisation of the
authentication system.
We believe the latest text
circulated by ICANN org attempts to achieve a shared goal –
that is reaching certainty in the implementation and
enforcement of the policy.
However, we are concerned that
as the text stands now it might imply that a new policy
development process would be required to include the
authentication system in the registration data policy.
This is why we propose a text
that we believe provides more flexibility. You will find
more details in the rationale attached to the proposed text,
but from the GAC perspective a new PDP is neither necessary
nor desirable. We are already at the stage of implementing
consensus policy (EPDP Phase 1 recommendations) and it was
upon request of the ICANN Board and the GNSO Council that
the issue of authentication was addressed in parallel to the
establishment of a timeline. The GAC has agreed to this
request and accepted that the PSWG would devote resources to
work with relevant parties to establish a mechanism that
when ready should be embedded in the policy (and that as any
system can be improved and expanded over time).
We also offer a small
suggestion concerning the text on the timeline, in case it
would provide more clarity.
Looking forward to meeting some
of you in Dublin at ICANN84, where perhaps we could also
exchange on this subject.
Kind Regards,
Gemma on behalf of the GAC
Small Team

GEMMA
CAROLILLO
Deputy
Head of Unit
Future
Internet
European
Commission
DG
Communications Networks, Content and Technology
Rue
de la Loi, 51
1000
Brussels, Belgium
gemma.carolillo@ec.europa.eu
Dear IRT Members,
I want to
sincerely thank you for your contributions and collaboration
thus far. It has been a pleasure working with you over the
past six months.
As promised,
attached are the clean and redline versions of the draft
proposal language. Please provide your feedback no later
than
Friday, 17 October. Our goal is to subsequently
publish this language for public comment on
Wednesday, 22 October.
Your feedback
prior to the public comment period will be incorporated into
an updated rationale paper, which will be published
alongside the proposal during public comment as an
additional resource for commenters, to show the discussions
that have taken place in regard to the timeline for
responding to urgent requests.
As a reminder,
the public comment period will provide a transparent
opportunity for IRT members as well as other stakeholders to
share feedback on the proposal. The public comment also
provides the opportunity to raise alternative suggestions
that have not already been discussed during the urgent
request related IRT sessions.
Clean Version of Proposed
Language
Redlined Version of Proposed
Language.
·
Note that both versions
do not include previous IRT feedback to make updates and
ICANN org rationales easier to find. If you’d like to review
previous IRT feedback, you can do
so here which also includes the previous
(August 2025) Iteration of the
proposed language.
Thank you again
for your time, effort, and thoughtful contributions. I look
forward to your feedback.
Kind Regards,
Isabelle Colas-Adeshina
Sr. Manager, Policy Research
& Stakeholder Programs
Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Los Angeles, CA
www.icann.org
Mobile: +1 310 266 7469