- 23:39No, the idea is to
- define the semantics of the generic information that we have right now in the deposit, so that the deposit right now contains 2, that elements, pre, generic
- voice and email.
- There is no definition of what
- they mean. So it could mean, I use context. It could mean generic context. It could mean marketing context.
- Who knows? Right? So the idea with advisory is to define the semantics of those generic elements
- to be the abuse context. So there is no question
- when someone is restoring this deposit.
- That information contained within those generic elements
- refers to the abuse context.
- What do you have for yourself?
- 24:19So I guess my concern is that is there something less useful about identifying a generic contact as opposed to a more specific abuse contact which seems to be the intent of the specification. In the first place.
- 24:38Mark, maybe you see. Go ahead.
- 24:43Spark. Anderson. I
- I guess I'm I'm surprised by the the amount of discussion on on this one. I I I see this is pretty pretty straightforward.
- so so from, you know. So again, this, this.
- this is only only impactful. As as Gustavo said, this is
- only impactful to
- the registry operator, the escrow provider, and
- the and whoever would be restoring for mass grow. As as Gustavo pointed out. Currently, there's only
- there's 3 boroughs who are also registry operators. So so these, these are the the only entities that are that are impacted by this. There isn't
- any operational impact. Otherwise it doesn't change anything external to the public. There's there's no change to our app.
- There's no Epp change. There's no impact to registrars. There's no no change to Dns. So there's no, you know other otherwise impactful change to
- you know, to to to the entire ecosystem. This is this is just an advisory that's
- provides additional clarification to registry operators and escrow providers on how to escrow under the registration data policy.
- I'm getting
- getting to Steve's
- question or or point he's trying to make. You know
- these, you know, the the the fields that Gustavo has is proposing to to reuse are undefined currently.
- and if if we were restoring
- a restoring a registry based on an escrow deposit. And there were values in those fields today. We would drop them on the ground.
- You know these would. These are these are, you know, these are fields that have no defined use today.
- So in restoring a registry, if if there were values in those fields because they're undefined and they're unneeded. We would. We would drop them. They they wouldn't be used because there's no definition for what they are and what they're used for.
- Staff is proposing to create an advisory that details how these fields must be used. And so this would. This would be a must, because esc under the new policy escrow of abuse, contact email and phone is is a must.
- And so this advisory says you must use these fields to ask of this data in this way.
- and so registries would escrow providers would validate. Ensure that data is, is is present and and valid, and Eboros or
- anybody else restoring this would
- no to restore that data in that way. So
- from from from my perspective. I think it's I think it's it's very, very straightforward. There's there's there's limited impact. It's it's, you know, we have these
- unused fields which line up rather nicely and
- and and and you know, don't don't seem to present any any issues or conflicts from from my perspective.
- 28:17So to Steve. Answer Steve's question from myself. The registry operator would know when they restore it, because they have the advisory as a registry operator, and there'd be plenty of communication to them when these advisory goes out, and the reminder that's how they were. Know
- this is the instructions to the registry operator, saying, Hey, let registry operator, let's do it this way. And if the registry operator all agrees, then that's it.
- And right now
- there isn't clarity, but we're providing clarity anything else.
- Let's see, we are at the top of the hour. 30 min seem really short.
- and but we try this way.
- 28:58And I said, It's a new hand for me.
- I know.
- I know Steve.
- I know. Steve dropped, but on the chance that he's listening to the recording later. You know he's concerned that
- he has not heard how the necessary detail of how the restore process will know. You know. I'll just.
- I'll just say, you know, Icann has issued advisories in the past. This is a a standard process that we are used to and comfortable with. And so
- the advisory is the mechanism. As you know. As Gustav was saying, the advisory is the mechanism. This is something that's that's done before. And
- yeah. And this is
- I, you know I would dare to say, a standard practice for how to deal with something like this.
- 29:42It is
- most definitely
- we're using the tools and the vehicles that
- these are already available to us. And we use. We have used this
- so many times. There's many advisory that's already been done. So this is not new. But for some people I understand this is a new Uk. So we? We need to take the time to explain these things, and that's part of our
- purpose for the meeting anything else from anyone.
- Thank you so much.
