hi all,

i was reviewing this proposal today and realized that it would have been helpful when we were deciding to suspend the DSSA last December.  as it was, we went ahead and suspended it on our own, without checking back with our respective ACs and SOs.  having a more formal process would have given us the opportunity to bring broader attention to that decision.

so i could either write a personal comment of support as co-chair of that working group, or i could write one for us and use that as an example.  i'm not envisioning a really long comment, just an expression of support.

thoughts?

mikey



Begin forwarded message:

From: "ICANN News Alert" <communications@icann.org>
Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Proposed Modification of GNSO PDP Manual to Address the Suspension of a PDP
Date: March 7, 2013 8:09:24 PM CST
To: <mike@haven2.com>

ICANN

News Alert

http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-07mar13-en.htm

Proposed Modification of GNSO PDP Manual to Address the Suspension of a PDP

7 March 2013

 
Forum Announcement:Comment Period Opens onDate:7 March 2013
Categories/Tags:
  • Policy Processes
  • Reviews/Improvements
Purpose (Brief):The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) is recommending a modification of the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) Manual, which is an integral part of the GNSO Operating Procedures, to address the possible termination or suspension of a PDP.
Public Comment Box Link:http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/pdp-suspension-07mar13-en.htm


This message was sent to mike@haven2.com from:

ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536

Email Marketing byiContact - Try It Free!

Manage Your Subscription


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)