For those who like to comment at this stage I attach the draft definitions
the Policy&Implementation WG (subteam) has provided so far for
discussion.
I am personally not fully satisfied with the result, in particular with the
differentiation between a “capital p” Policy and a “lower case” policy. To my
understanding this could be explained in written form only. But I’ve never heard
talking people or “experts” in upper or lower cases.
This
document is still a draft until the WG shall have provided its
report.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:26 PM
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - revised PI Working
Definitions
Dear All,
On behalf of the definitions sub-team, please find attached an updated
version of the proposed working definitions in which the sub-team has aimed to
address the comments and feedback provided by the Working Group during the last
meeting.
As you review this document, please take into account that these working
definitions have been developed for the limited use by the PI Working group as a
starting point to facilitate the discussions and deliberations outlined in the
WG's charter. These definitions are expected to evolve during and as a result of
the WG deliberations. At the end of the process, the WG is expected to review
these definitions, add/update as deemed appropriate and include them in the
Final Report.
Should you have any comments, proposed edits and/or questions, you are
strongly encouraged to share these in advance of the next meeting (Wednesday 19
February) with the mailing list.
Best regards,
Marika