I think we could support the motion - unless any ISPCP member having Ry/Rr interests is against

"requesting an issues report to evauate whether a minimum baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all in scope ICANN agreements".

Strong opposition from the contracted parties house can be expected.

Any comments?

Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich

----- Original Message -----

From: Deutsch, Sarah B

To: wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de

Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:46 PM

Subject: Support for RAP Motion

Dear Wolf-Ulrich:

On today's BC call, members asked if we could count on the ISCP's support for Zahid's motion to address the remaining registration abuse policies (#5 attached), especially with respect to uniformity of contracts.

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011

Would you all be in position to support this?

Thanks and best,

Sarah

Sarah B. Deutsch
Vice President & Associate General Counsel
Verizon Communications
Phone: 703-351-3044
Fax: 703-351-3670