All,
 
see attached the "selectors'" proposal on the next AoC RT size. My opinion is that we should oppose and keep the present GNSO position (4 seats). Budget limitation is really not an argument on such high level.
 
On the other hand I would appreciate Olivier commenting on his experience regarding the size of the Accountability RT and its managing. Does this look inefficient?
 
Tony Holmes, do you have a chance to share views with the ExComm?
 
In addition I would welcome any comment on the RT evaluation process I've provided to you last week in order to brief Jaime and myself for the coming council meeting June 10.
 
 

Regards
Wolf-Ulrich

 

Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Juni 2010 20:45
An: council@gnso.icann.org
Betreff: [council] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on the next RTs

Please note what the AoC Selectors have proposed for the next two RTs.  Please provide any comments you have on this list.  Time permitting, we will also briefly discuss this in meeting on 10 June.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-soac-discussion@icann.org [mailto:owner-soac-discussion@icann.org] On Behalf Of Janis Karklins
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 1:50 PM
To: soac-discussion@icann.org
Cc: 'Rod Beckstrom'; 'Donna Austin'; 'Olof Nordling'
Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on the next RTs

 

Dear colleagues

 

On behalf of Selectors I would like to propose that the size and composition of the two next review teams would be as follows:

 

                                                    Security               WHOIS
GAC, including the Chair           2                              1
GNSO                                                2                             2
ccNSO                                               2                            1
ALAC                                                 2                             1
SSAC                                                  1                             1
RSSAC                                               1
ASO                                                    1                              1
Independent expert                 1-2                          2 (law enforcement/privacy experts)
CEO                                                     1                             1
                                                          13-14                         10

I understand that your initial suggestions/requests were not fully accommodated, but for the sake of efficiency, credibility of the process, budgetary limitations Selectors have developed this proposal. If we would take into account all wishes, the RT size would be over 20 which in Selectors’ view is not credible option.

 

I hope that proposal will be equally unacceptable for everybody. I would appreciate your comments or expression of non-objection in coming week. Only after assessment of the violence of your opposition the Selectors will make their proposal (in present form or modified) public.

 

Best regards

JK