Tony,
I support the IPC position, alter all the discussion around WHOIS and Thick WHOIS to allow certain TLD to restrain access to Whois data is contrary to the work done. Also if one TLD is allowed it is going to be very difficult to prevent others to do the same.
I think the ISPCP should strongly support this position.
Best regards,
|
|
Ing. Osvaldo Novoa
Tel: +598 2928 6444 |
De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org]
En nombre de tony holmes
Enviado el: Jueves, 07 de Junio de 2012 16:15 p.m.
Para: ispcp@icann.org
Asunto: [ispcp] FW: Reconsideration request from IPC regarding .CAT Whois
All
Please see the note from Steve Metalitz below.
Personally I share Steve’s concerns. An opt out from WHOIS, just when we’re looking towards the Review Teams report to cure many of the ills associated with WHOIS doesn’t sit well.
Please let me know if you would oppose the ISPCP offering support for the IPC position.
Tony
From: Metalitz,
Steven [mailto:met@msk.com]
Sent: 07 June 2012 18:55
To: Tony Holmes; Marilyn Cade
Subject: FW: Reconsideration request from IPC regarding .CAT Whois
Tony and Marilyn,
IPC believes that the ICANN Board approval of .cat’s request to “opt out” of public access to Whois sets a terrible precedent on a number of accounts and violates the Affirmation of Commitments. Accordingly we have made a formal reconsideration request to the Board Governance Committee (please see attached and below). We would welcome any support that either of your constituencies could provide in this effort. Please let me know if you have questions.
Steve Metalitz, IPC president