Fwd: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
FYI Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:
Von: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com> Datum: 3. April 2013 08:27:43 GMT+08:00 An: Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Betreff: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
I'd like to propose the following motion for the Beijing meeting (resending from the correct address):
Whereas the most recently posted draft Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) has raised serious concerns of policy among most of the stakeholder groups in the GNSO [see Minutes of March call];
Whereas ICANN negotiators have held it out as a blocker to the implementation of the New gTLD Program;
Resolved, Council recommends that ICANN permit Registrars to extend the rights and obligations in the current RAA and its renewals to new gTLDs until such time as the GNSO adopts a consensus supporting the policy changes in any proposed new RAA.
Thanks, --Wendy
-- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613 Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/ https://www.torproject.org/ http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
participants (1)
-
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de