All, Well, what do you think about the LSE Review of the GNSO? Herewith, some random observations of my own. I think their heart is basically in the right place, realizing that the GNSO does not work too well today and improvements could be undertaken to improve its efficiency. Getting rid of weighted voting, streamlined procedures, more diverse participation, moving procedural details from the ICANN bylaws to the GNSO Rules, etc all seem like steps in the right direction. I like the idea of ICANN paying GNSO councilors' expenses because I think cost can be a barrier to entry. Fewer teleconferences and more face to face council meetings *sounds* like a good idea, but it could be a bit rough on travel. Perhaps in such a world, the number of full-blown ICANN meetings could be reduced, say from 3 to 2 per year, while the council meetings would be more numerous but shorter (say, 5 meetings of 3 days each). But I think the LSE recommendations are often somewhat simplistic and some are, well, downright stupid (I'm especially astonished at the reasoning that because ISPs, BC and IP often agree, there's no point in having 3 separate constituencies), betraying a fundamental lack of understanding of ICANN. LSE clearly don't understand that ISPs are not just another business user. Oddly, they recommend a streamlined council (with 16 members, with 3 constituencies and 3 nomcom appointees) in which there is *less* stakeholder representation and registries/registrars still have veto power over consensus policy. They also don't get that nomcom appointees are basically each a "constituency of one" representing no one by themselves. Nomcom delenda est!! There has been some discussion of term limits on the council list - most don't see the need and some have even opined that one needs to be a councilor for several years before one can really have an impact. Comments? Brickbats? Greg PS: I am amused that they blithely suggest the GNSO council elect board members and Council chair by the same process that is used to elect the Lord Mayor of London :-) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com