Re: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.
Thanks Wolf-Ulrich, As input to our discussion, please note the elements provided by Mary after yesterday's working session. I also understand from the answer provided by staff during that session that this framework, although not yet formalized, will be put in place as soon as the preparation for the board's vote on EPDP phase 2 recommendations. I think there's some recognition that this may be helpful but also some concerns relative to this adding an extra layer of complexity or on the risks of seeing this operational design phase address policy items that may have been overlooked by the PDP WG. Regards, Philippe -----Original Message----- From: ispcp [mailto:ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of wuknoben@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 12:14 AM To: 'Novoa, Osvaldo'; ispcp@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Thanks Osvaldo and Philippe! Some observations: I recognize the necessity for the Board to have a complete picture of the impact of recommendations (cost, personal ressources etc.). The proposal adds another process (Design Phase) and working body (Design Feedback Group, DFG) to the existing ones which would build additional working load on the community. The work anyway is staff's obligation, not the community's one. How could this effort be minimized? The alternative option, described beginning on page 7, seems to be a possible solution and could be investigated a bit more in detail (engagement of the PDP-WG). Maybe this way the PDP-WG could cover the tasks of the DFG which otherwise would need a specific election process within the GNSO. Just some thoughts for your council debates. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ispcp <ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org> Im Auftrag von Novoa, Osvaldo Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2020 02:07 An: ispcp@gnso.icann.org Betreff: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Hello all, Please see the attached mail, I would appreciate your comments. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: "Drazek, Keith via council" <council@gnso.icann.org> Fecha: 5 de octubre de 2020, 18:35:06 UYT Para: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "stephanie@digitaldiscretion.ca" <stephanie@digitaldiscretion.ca>, "aheineman@godaddy.com" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "bruna.mrtns@gmail.com" <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, "wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>, "claudia.selli@intl.att.com" <claudia.selli@intl.att.com> Asunto: Re: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Responder a: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com> Hi all, During the 23 September SO/AC Leaders call with Goran, Maarten and Leon, the concept of an “Operational Design Phase” was introduced by Goran. We had a preliminary discussion on the topic and Goran indicated that ICANN would produce a paper for community consideration and feedback. That paper is attached here for your review, and Goran’s email to the SO/AC Leaders is below. I’ll highlight 3 points from Goran’s note and from the discussion on the call: * The objective for the design phase is to better prepare the Board by providing operational and resourcing information before making decisions on GNSO-approved policy recommendations. * While the GNSO Council is the manager of the PDP and gTLD policy development is within the GNSO's remit, consensus policy making involves all stakeholders (including ACs who give advice to the Board). * This design phase concept doesn't affect policy development or the CPIF. It recognizes that if policy issues are impacted, they rightfully go back to the GNSO for its consideration, rather than permitting ICANN Org or Board to make unilateral changes. (I made this point during the call) Please review the attached paper and work within your SGs and Cs to develop feedback. Also, Karen Lentz will touch on this during our Tuesday Council Working Session. To Goran’s last point about conducting a “fuller consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle,” we’ll need to ensure that the GNSO Council and our SGs and Cs are prepared to engage where appropriate and in light of our ongoing PDP 3.0 work and the upcoming GNSO Review. Thanks and regards, Keith From: soac-chairs <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Goran Marby Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 3:19 PM To: soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org> Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>; Cassia Oliveira <cassia.oliveira@icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [soac-chairs] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Cassia Oliveira on behalf of Goran Marby Dear SOAC leaders, Thank you again for taking the time to meet with Maarten and me last week. I am writing to follow up on one of ICANN org’s action items from that call, which was for me to finalize and circulate to you a proposal for a new Operational Design Phase relating to the implementation of approved gTLD policies. As we discussed, the objective for an additional design phase is to allow the Board to obtain relevant information about any operational and resourcing issues associated with certain policy implementation efforts. Accordingly, the Operational Design Phase is envisioned to take place prior to Board action on GNSO-approved policy recommendations, initiated through a Board request to ICANN org. Our expectation is that an Operational Design Phase will likely only be needed for complex, costly or other large-scale implementation efforts. I appreciate the thoughtful and substantive discussion we had on this topic during our call. While gTLD policy development work is managed by the GNSO, the other Supporting Organizations and the Advisory Committees play important roles in ensuring that ICANN consensus policies are developed through community consensus and are appropriately resourced. Thank you for the comments and suggestions you made on the call, which we have tried to address as much as possible in this initial draft paper. Please circulate the paper to your community groups for their review and further discussion. As I mentioned on our call, ICANN org will continue to refine the paper and welcome your feedback as part of this iterative process. After ICANN69, we plan to conduct a fuller community consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle, to include an updated version of this paper and to gather community feedback on any updates we can make to improve the efficacy and efficiency of the policy making process. Best regards, Göran Marby President & CEO ICANN +1(310) 578 8690 Cássia Oliveira Sr. Manager, Office of the President & CEO cassia.oliveira@icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira@icann.org> +1(310) 578 8656 ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ ispcp mailing list ispcp@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ispcp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Hello all, I agree with Philippe. Also, this seems like part of the process of the PDP, how can a WG propose a new Policy without evaluating, at least roughly, the impact to ICANN? I think that in all the WG I've participated it was done. Perhaps this in a more in depth study of the impact. Anyways, now we will have three public comments periods, one for the WG Draft Report, a second for the Final Report and a third for ICANN org's assessment of its impact. Wouldn't it be more efficient to have the impact analysis before the final report and include this analysis in the report? Best regards, Osvaldo -----Mensaje original----- De: philippe.fouquart@orange.com [mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com] Enviado el: jueves, 08 de octubre de 2020 05:15 a.m. Para: wuknoben@gmail.com; Novoa, Osvaldo; ispcp@gnso.icann.org Asunto: RE: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Thanks Wolf-Ulrich, As input to our discussion, please note the elements provided by Mary after yesterday's working session. I also understand from the answer provided by staff during that session that this framework, although not yet formalized, will be put in place as soon as the preparation for the board's vote on EPDP phase 2 recommendations. I think there's some recognition that this may be helpful but also some concerns relative to this adding an extra layer of complexity or on the risks of seeing this operational design phase address policy items that may have been overlooked by the PDP WG. Regards, Philippe -----Original Message----- From: ispcp [mailto:ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of wuknoben@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 12:14 AM To: 'Novoa, Osvaldo'; ispcp@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Thanks Osvaldo and Philippe! Some observations: I recognize the necessity for the Board to have a complete picture of the impact of recommendations (cost, personal ressources etc.). The proposal adds another process (Design Phase) and working body (Design Feedback Group, DFG) to the existing ones which would build additional working load on the community. The work anyway is staff's obligation, not the community's one. How could this effort be minimized? The alternative option, described beginning on page 7, seems to be a possible solution and could be investigated a bit more in detail (engagement of the PDP-WG). Maybe this way the PDP-WG could cover the tasks of the DFG which otherwise would need a specific election process within the GNSO. Just some thoughts for your council debates. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ispcp <ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org> Im Auftrag von Novoa, Osvaldo Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2020 02:07 An: ispcp@gnso.icann.org Betreff: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Hello all, Please see the attached mail, I would appreciate your comments. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: "Drazek, Keith via council" <council@gnso.icann.org> Fecha: 5 de octubre de 2020, 18:35:06 UYT Para: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "stephanie@digitaldiscretion.ca" <stephanie@digitaldiscretion.ca>, "aheineman@godaddy.com" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "bruna.mrtns@gmail.com" <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, "wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>, "claudia.selli@intl.att.com" <claudia.selli@intl.att.com> Asunto: Re: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Responder a: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com> Hi all, During the 23 September SO/AC Leaders call with Goran, Maarten and Leon, the concept of an “Operational Design Phase” was introduced by Goran. We had a preliminary discussion on the topic and Goran indicated that ICANN would produce a paper for community consideration and feedback. That paper is attached here for your review, and Goran’s email to the SO/AC Leaders is below. I’ll highlight 3 points from Goran’s note and from the discussion on the call: * The objective for the design phase is to better prepare the Board by providing operational and resourcing information before making decisions on GNSO-approved policy recommendations. * While the GNSO Council is the manager of the PDP and gTLD policy development is within the GNSO's remit, consensus policy making involves all stakeholders (including ACs who give advice to the Board). * This design phase concept doesn't affect policy development or the CPIF. It recognizes that if policy issues are impacted, they rightfully go back to the GNSO for its consideration, rather than permitting ICANN Org or Board to make unilateral changes. (I made this point during the call) Please review the attached paper and work within your SGs and Cs to develop feedback. Also, Karen Lentz will touch on this during our Tuesday Council Working Session. To Goran’s last point about conducting a “fuller consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle,” we’ll need to ensure that the GNSO Council and our SGs and Cs are prepared to engage where appropriate and in light of our ongoing PDP 3.0 work and the upcoming GNSO Review. Thanks and regards, Keith From: soac-chairs <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Goran Marby Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 3:19 PM To: soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org> Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>; Cassia Oliveira <cassia.oliveira@icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [soac-chairs] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Cassia Oliveira on behalf of Goran Marby Dear SOAC leaders, Thank you again for taking the time to meet with Maarten and me last week. I am writing to follow up on one of ICANN org’s action items from that call, which was for me to finalize and circulate to you a proposal for a new Operational Design Phase relating to the implementation of approved gTLD policies. As we discussed, the objective for an additional design phase is to allow the Board to obtain relevant information about any operational and resourcing issues associated with certain policy implementation efforts. Accordingly, the Operational Design Phase is envisioned to take place prior to Board action on GNSO-approved policy recommendations, initiated through a Board request to ICANN org. Our expectation is that an Operational Design Phase will likely only be needed for complex, costly or other large-scale implementation efforts. I appreciate the thoughtful and substantive discussion we had on this topic during our call. While gTLD policy development work is managed by the GNSO, the other Supporting Organizations and the Advisory Committees play important roles in ensuring that ICANN consensus policies are developed through community consensus and are appropriately resourced. Thank you for the comments and suggestions you made on the call, which we have tried to address as much as possible in this initial draft paper. Please circulate the paper to your community groups for their review and further discussion. As I mentioned on our call, ICANN org will continue to refine the paper and welcome your feedback as part of this iterative process. After ICANN69, we plan to conduct a fuller community consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle, to include an updated version of this paper and to gather community feedback on any updates we can make to improve the efficacy and efficiency of the policy making process. Best regards, Göran Marby President & CEO ICANN +1(310) 578 8690 Cássia Oliveira Sr. Manager, Office of the President & CEO cassia.oliveira@icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira@icann.org> +1(310) 578 8656 ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ ispcp mailing list ispcp@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ispcp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
My understanding of the process was the same as Osvaldo's, that this is normally evaluated as part of the WG procedure. So is this down to the fact that the implications for ICANN exceed any previous output which therefore demands a change of approach, or is it that the normal process wasn't well understood? If it’s the former that should have been discussed and agreed at the WG level, but as far as I'm aware that didn't happen. Regards Tony -----Original Message----- From: ispcp <ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Novoa, Osvaldo Sent: 08 October 2020 14:02 To: 'philippe.fouquart@orange.com' <philippe.fouquart@orange.com>; wuknoben@gmail.com; ispcp@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Hello all, I agree with Philippe. Also, this seems like part of the process of the PDP, how can a WG propose a new Policy without evaluating, at least roughly, the impact to ICANN? I think that in all the WG I've participated it was done. Perhaps this in a more in depth study of the impact. Anyways, now we will have three public comments periods, one for the WG Draft Report, a second for the Final Report and a third for ICANN org's assessment of its impact. Wouldn't it be more efficient to have the impact analysis before the final report and include this analysis in the report? Best regards, Osvaldo -----Mensaje original----- De: philippe.fouquart@orange.com [mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com] Enviado el: jueves, 08 de octubre de 2020 05:15 a.m. Para: wuknoben@gmail.com; Novoa, Osvaldo; ispcp@gnso.icann.org Asunto: RE: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Thanks Wolf-Ulrich, As input to our discussion, please note the elements provided by Mary after yesterday's working session. I also understand from the answer provided by staff during that session that this framework, although not yet formalized, will be put in place as soon as the preparation for the board's vote on EPDP phase 2 recommendations. I think there's some recognition that this may be helpful but also some concerns relative to this adding an extra layer of complexity or on the risks of seeing this operational design phase address policy items that may have been overlooked by the PDP WG. Regards, Philippe -----Original Message----- From: ispcp [mailto:ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of wuknoben@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 12:14 AM To: 'Novoa, Osvaldo'; ispcp@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Thanks Osvaldo and Philippe! Some observations: I recognize the necessity for the Board to have a complete picture of the impact of recommendations (cost, personal ressources etc.). The proposal adds another process (Design Phase) and working body (Design Feedback Group, DFG) to the existing ones which would build additional working load on the community. The work anyway is staff's obligation, not the community's one. How could this effort be minimized? The alternative option, described beginning on page 7, seems to be a possible solution and could be investigated a bit more in detail (engagement of the PDP-WG). Maybe this way the PDP-WG could cover the tasks of the DFG which otherwise would need a specific election process within the GNSO. Just some thoughts for your council debates. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ispcp <ispcp-bounces@gnso.icann.org> Im Auftrag von Novoa, Osvaldo Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2020 02:07 An: ispcp@gnso.icann.org Betreff: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Hello all, Please see the attached mail, I would appreciate your comments. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: "Drazek, Keith via council" <council@gnso.icann.org> Fecha: 5 de octubre de 2020, 18:35:06 UYT Para: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "stephanie@digitaldiscretion.ca" <stephanie@digitaldiscretion.ca>, "aheineman@godaddy.com" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "bruna.mrtns@gmail.com" <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, "wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>, "claudia.selli@intl.att.com" <claudia.selli@intl.att.com> Asunto: Re: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Responder a: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com> Hi all, During the 23 September SO/AC Leaders call with Goran, Maarten and Leon, the concept of an “Operational Design Phase” was introduced by Goran. We had a preliminary discussion on the topic and Goran indicated that ICANN would produce a paper for community consideration and feedback. That paper is attached here for your review, and Goran’s email to the SO/AC Leaders is below. I’ll highlight 3 points from Goran’s note and from the discussion on the call: * The objective for the design phase is to better prepare the Board by providing operational and resourcing information before making decisions on GNSO-approved policy recommendations. * While the GNSO Council is the manager of the PDP and gTLD policy development is within the GNSO's remit, consensus policy making involves all stakeholders (including ACs who give advice to the Board). * This design phase concept doesn't affect policy development or the CPIF. It recognizes that if policy issues are impacted, they rightfully go back to the GNSO for its consideration, rather than permitting ICANN Org or Board to make unilateral changes. (I made this point during the call) Please review the attached paper and work within your SGs and Cs to develop feedback. Also, Karen Lentz will touch on this during our Tuesday Council Working Session. To Goran’s last point about conducting a “fuller consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle,” we’ll need to ensure that the GNSO Council and our SGs and Cs are prepared to engage where appropriate and in light of our ongoing PDP 3.0 work and the upcoming GNSO Review. Thanks and regards, Keith From: soac-chairs <soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Goran Marby Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 3:19 PM To: soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org> Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby@icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>; Cassia Oliveira <cassia.oliveira@icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [soac-chairs] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback. Cassia Oliveira on behalf of Goran Marby Dear SOAC leaders, Thank you again for taking the time to meet with Maarten and me last week. I am writing to follow up on one of ICANN org’s action items from that call, which was for me to finalize and circulate to you a proposal for a new Operational Design Phase relating to the implementation of approved gTLD policies. As we discussed, the objective for an additional design phase is to allow the Board to obtain relevant information about any operational and resourcing issues associated with certain policy implementation efforts. Accordingly, the Operational Design Phase is envisioned to take place prior to Board action on GNSO-approved policy recommendations, initiated through a Board request to ICANN org. Our expectation is that an Operational Design Phase will likely only be needed for complex, costly or other large-scale implementation efforts. I appreciate the thoughtful and substantive discussion we had on this topic during our call. While gTLD policy development work is managed by the GNSO, the other Supporting Organizations and the Advisory Committees play important roles in ensuring that ICANN consensus policies are developed through community consensus and are appropriately resourced. Thank you for the comments and suggestions you made on the call, which we have tried to address as much as possible in this initial draft paper. Please circulate the paper to your community groups for their review and further discussion. As I mentioned on our call, ICANN org will continue to refine the paper and welcome your feedback as part of this iterative process. After ICANN69, we plan to conduct a fuller community consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle, to include an updated version of this paper and to gather community feedback on any updates we can make to improve the efficacy and efficiency of the policy making process. Best regards, Göran Marby President & CEO ICANN +1(310) 578 8690 Cássia Oliveira Sr. Manager, Office of the President & CEO cassia.oliveira@icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira@icann.org> +1(310) 578 8656 ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ ispcp mailing list ispcp@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ispcp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ ispcp mailing list ispcp@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ispcp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (3)
-
Novoa, Osvaldo -
philippe.fouquart＠orange.com -
tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com