Thank you Wang Wei for the warm hospitality and thank you all for the great meeting :-)

 

Hope you all had a safe return trip and wish you have a good rest in the coming weekend.

 

Kind regards,

Minjung

------------ 원본 메일 내용 ------------
보낸 사람 : "HiroHOTTA"<hotta@jprs.co.jp>
받는 사람 : "王?" <wangwei@cnic.cn>
참      조 : KoreanGP@icann.org, JapaneseGP@icann.org, ChineseGP@icann.org
메일 제목 : Re: [Koreangp] CJK Joint meeting record and homework
보낸 날짜 : Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:50:05 +0900
 

Thank you, Wang Wei.
It was a very nice meeting together with your hospitality!
Hiro

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:18:27 +0800
王? <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Please find the attached documents of meeting agenda & record, and
> the action item (homework)
>
> Thanks everyone who join the meeting in the two days. We will keep
> working on it.
>
>
> Regards
> WANG Wei
>
> -----?件原件-----
> ?件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代
> 表 HiroHOTTA
> ?送??: 2016年3月21日 8:53
> 收件人: ChineseGP@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org; KoreanGP@icann.org
> 主?: [ChineseGP] how 'blocked' can help us
>
> (During 4 hours struggle with the letters without significant output ...)
>
> A question has come to my mind and won't disappear...
>
> ! What are the future of "allocatable labels"?
>
> Let's assume the case where
> registrant-X applied for label-A,
> and label-B is marked as 'allocatable' by LGR,
> then, label-A is delegated to registrant-X.
>
> As far as I understand, the above means "only registrant-X has the right to
> apply for label-B in the future." If registrant-X wants label-B to be
> delegated, he/she needs to make a separate application to ICANN. And ICANN
> will evaluate the label-B by a human panel (maybe supported by some
> automatic mechanism).
>
> Then, what's the difference between
> (1) all variants are allocatable
> (2) some variants are allocatable and the others are blocked
> (or invalid)
>
> I understand (2) can make the applicant know that the application for some
> strings (that are blocked/invalid) will definitely be rejected in any case.
> Howev! er, this does not reduce the number of TLD delegations significantly < BR>> because the applicant does want only a few variant TLDs in reality, for
> money-wise reason or usage-wise reason.
>
> then,,,,, why is (1) so evil?
>
> Hiro
>
> _______________________________________________
> ChineseGP mailing list
> ChineseGP@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp


_______________________________________________
Koreangp mailing list
Koreangp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/koreangp