Dear All,

Thanks for these proposed items. I'd like to propose that CJK should set up 
a working group that concentrate on CJK overlapped codepoints (issues/solutions).
It is less productive without certain level of commitment/resources from the 
community.  It is difficult to see a clear perspective from the current working practice.
Things happened only if goals/schedule identified. 

Best Regards

Kenny Huang


On 19 January 2015 at 09:44, Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Hotta san, All,

Yes it would be great if the GPs could compile a series of questions and an
agenda for the meeting.

For the questions for IP, if you could send them to us earlier, we can get
an initial response from IP before the meeting (over email) for further
discussion during the meeting.  Please let us know.

Regards,
Sarmad

-----Original Message-----
From: hotta@jprs.co.jp [mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 6:01 AM
To: Sarmad Hussain
Cc: ChineseGP@icann.org; KoreanGP@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org; Yoshiro
YONEYA; Wang Wei; Kenny Huang (huangksh@gmail.com); KIM Kyongsok
(gimgs0@gmail.com); Dongman Lee
Subject: Re: Chinese, Japanese and Korean GP Coordination meeting
2:30-3:30pm Monday 9 Feb. at ICANN 52, Singapore

Thank you, Sarmad,

May I propose that we
a) compile any kind of questions from each language LGR, IP, and
   ICANN by January 26
b) categorize those questions and define meeting agenda items,
   where each agenda item accommodates relevant questions raised in a)
c) define the overall meeting agenda and the time to be required
   to discuss them
?

a) by Friday 23 January
b) by Thursday 29 January
c) by Tuesday 3 February



For example, it seems we (at least I) still need clear and common
understanding about
(1) the rules of the "integration"
      - what the specification of each language LGR looks like
        * for example, whether each language LGR have to have
          inherited/adopted/passive variants in its LGR (= input
          to IP)
      - basic mechanisms of the LGR integration performed by IP
        * for example, how the output of integration looks like :
          when 2 characters are independent characters in Japanese
          LGR and they are defined as variants in Chinese/Korean LGR,
          are both of those 2 characters allocatable in integrated
          LGR?
(2) the outline of each language LGR


Hiro


On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:57:22 +0000
Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> We will be organizing a coordination meeting between Chinese, Japanese
> and Korean Generation Panel members during the Singapore meeting as
> per the following schedule.  IP members will be present.  We will also
> arrange remote participation during this session.
>
>       Time: 14:30 - 15:30
>       Date: Monday, 9 February 2015
>       Room: To be announced
>
> If this is insufficient time, please let us know details and we can
> organize an additional session.
>
> We will share further details as soon as they are available.
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hotta@jprs.co.jp [mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 8:19 PM
> To: Dillon, Chris
> Cc: ?超; Sarmad Hussain; Yoshiro YONEYA; ChineseGP@icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ChineseGP] proposal to eliminate the divergence between
> us
>
> > I’m also looking forward to discussing these things in Singapore!
>
> Yes, definitely.
> Is there a plan for CJK & IP & ICANN to meet in Singapore already?
>
> Hiro