Dear Mr. Wang Wei: Thanks for your message. RE: your quesiton, it is explained in the document (shown below): * Note. For each of simplitional chars 8, 30, and 32, there are two corresponding traditional chars.* Hope it helps. Thanks again. KIM, K. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:21 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Dear Prof. Kim

Thanks for your efforts

One small question, I noticed there are several chars with YELLOW background, as follows:

Is there any difference on them?

Regards

WANG Wei

-----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok 发送时间: 2016年6月27日 23:04 收件人: koreanGP@icann.org; chinesegp@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org 抄送: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> 主题: [ChineseGP] 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3

Dear everybody:

Enclosed you will find 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3.

Thanks.

--

김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:10 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Thank you, Prof. Kim

I also find out that there are two variant groups:

simplitional char 21: (7CAE 粮) (7CE7 糧)

simplitional char 1: (788D 碍) (7919 礙)

NOT included in the original 260 unacceptable variant groups, in the document you sent out in March.

Sorry for the confusion. These two are includced in 43 acceptable var. groups. Thanks. KIM, K.

Are they the new unacceptable variants just raised up by K experts?

No.

Regards

WANG Wei

*发件人:* KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com] *发送时间:* 2016年6月28日 14:49 *收件人:* 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> *抄送:* koreanGP@icann.org; chinesegp@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org *主题:* Re: 答复: [ChineseGP] 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3

Dear Mr. Wang Wei:

Thanks for your message.

RE: your quesiton, it is explained in the document (shown below):

* Note. For each of simplitional chars 8, 30, and 32, there are two corresponding traditional chars.*

Hope it helps.

Thanks again.

KIM, K.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:21 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Dear Prof. Kim

Thanks for your efforts

One small question, I noticed there are several chars with YELLOW background, as follows:

Is there any difference on them?

Regards

WANG Wei

-----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok 发送时间: 2016年6月27日 23:04 收件人: koreanGP@icann.org; chinesegp@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org 抄送: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> 主题: [ChineseGP] 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3

Dear everybody:

Enclosed you will find 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3.

Thanks.

--

김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

--

김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

Dear Mr. Wang Wei. Thanks for your message. On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 2:22 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Hi Prof. Kim

I am writing to ask that if the 56 simp-trad groups would be treated as variant by KGP, or NOT ? (the simp-trad relationship is regarded as exchangeable variant in CDNC and CGP)

I will explain using an example: CN want to have a variant group composed of (機 - trad, 机 - simp). Korea would like to treat a simplified and a traditional char in a simp-trad group as INDEPENDENT (NOT as a variant) char. In other words, var. group (機, 机) : CN ===> indep char: 機 and : KR indep char: 机.

Just want to make sure that from your perspective, what kind of disposition rule on these 56 simp chars you would prefer.

RE: disposition: a) person1 wants to register x機y --> allocate this label to person1. b) later, person2 want to register x机y --> allocate this label to person2. I hope it answers your question. Thanks. Rgds, KIM, K.

Regards WANG Wei

-----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok 发送时间: 2016年6月27日 23:04 收件人: koreanGP@icann.org; chinesegp@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org 抄送: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> 主题: [ChineseGP] 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3

Dear everybody:

Enclosed you will find 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3.

Thanks.

-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok