But to me, far more important in the long term is the very clear rejection of "the GAC advises, the Board follows" model. The ruling has chipped away at the power of the GAC "advice" , and may change the dynamic of the stakeholder roles in ICANN.
Might this be an opportunity for At-Large to work towards balancing the roles of the ACs? Given that the relationship with the Board is different for the various ACs, based on the bye-laws.
Jacqueline

On 18 Jul 2017 11:38, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
The IRP decision:
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-amazon-final-declaration-11jul17-en.pdf

Dev Anand

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Carlton Samuels
<carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adds to the kerfuffle surrounding geographic names in the DNS.
>
> http://domainnamewire.com/2017/07/18/amazon-com-gets-big-win-domain-battle-may-yet-get-amazon-domain/
>
>
> -Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en