I'm confused. What "exceptional power"? From all our documentation and rules, the only power is the GA, which is the list when we are virtual, or the members in the room when we are f2f.
These terms are quite frightening to me as it seems that there are situations in which the constitution of the LACRALO can be overridden or put aside by a group without the input of all members.
I hope this is not so.
Jacqueline Morris

Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. (after Chris Lehmann )

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Dev,

Your quotation is right. However, the same rule says, "As a general rule", which means that there is an exception. It is true that we did not wait 2 weeks. The reason is because Alejandro Pisanty proposed this resolution the 20th of July in our general meeting with translation in English, Spanish and Portuguese.  We understood that the proposal had been known for a significant number of members of LACRALO on day 20th of July. Also, the proposal does not seem to be a complex motion that requires detailed analysis. Therefore, we used the exceptional power to vote on this motion without waiting the two weeks period.

In any case, we will put the motion for comments as you requested on the wiki.

Regards


El 29/07/2015 a las 11:56 a.m., Dev Anand Teelucksingh escribió:
I'm continue to be very disappointed at Alberto Soto and Humberto Carassco in the performance of their duties as chair and secretariat.

As per Rule 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than two weeks, to all participants in the working languages of the Assembly.

THIS WAS NOT DONE.

Can be motion be put on the wiki for comment? I'll comment on the motion there, since there is an amendment I'll suggest.

Kind Regards,

Dev Anand















On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:00 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> wrote:
== EN ==

Dear All, 
Do you support Mr. Alejandro Pisanty’s motion? Formal Motion from Alejandro Pisanty: 

a. LACRALO’s Chair and Secretariat shall do an Agenda with policy issues for discussion. 
b. The first 30 minutes of each monthly call shall be focused on debate of current ICANN public consultations. 
 
* Yes 
* No
* Abstain 

== ES ==

Hola a todos, 

¿Usted apoya la moción de Alejandro Pisanty?

a. que la Presidencia y la Secretaría hagan una agenda de temas de políticas para su discusión
b. que los primeros 30' de cada sesión mensual se dediquen a temas sustantivos de debate de políticas en curso en consultas públicas de ICANN

*Si  
*No  
*Abstención

Regards,

Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en




_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en


_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en