Olivier,

I find the draft lacking in understanding the necessary tensions in the non-commercial space, and in not making an analysis of the effects of increasing structural complexity on the GNSO in general.

Alejandro Pisanty

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM

Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Desde: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [ocl@gih.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 03 de agosto de 2015 08:43
Hasta: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
CC: Vanda Scartezini
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Hello all,

let me make this quite clear from the outset: ALAC members are asked to vote on the Statement, not on the GNSO Review Report. The ALAC Statement mentions the points it agrees with in the GNSO Review report. It mentions the points it does not agree with and is pretty strong on criticising the Consultants about the fact it completely missed the opportunity to evaluate the GNSO Structure. The ALAC response is pretty clear about that.
The call for comments was made on 15 July. The only ALAC member from LAC that commented was Vanda and her views were taken into account. The only other LACRALO member that commented was Carlton Samuels and his views were also taken into account.

In formulating the ALAC response, I unfortunately received no other input from LACRALO members, despite requests for feedback.

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 03/08/2015 15:18, cveraq@gmail.com wrote:

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization 
 From: cveraq@gmail.com

 Vanda: if you say &quot;I intend to vote in Please though I personally believe, and HAD Such statement made, That the review itself was really weak and did not touch Relevant several points.&quot; 


 It sounds contradictory and the vote should be against? 


 Carlos Vera Quintana 
 0988141143 
 Sguemecveraq

El 2/8/2015, a las 19:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> escribió:

I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several relevant points.

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e497ab67c.html
--]]

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en