[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Change in the priorities of At Large Desde: apisanty@gmail.com Colleagues, in https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+At-Large+Communit... - Abridged is http://bit.ly/2cpV0C5 for ease of use - may you. see the document that the ALAC gave the Board (Board) of ICANN, about priorities of general users in relation to ICANN. As you can see, there is a radical change from the proposal which discussion urge unsuccessfully, and reflects as much closer as which we believe are the issues that matter most to users. First are the operation of the DNS (particularly ALAC prefaced WHOIS) and very end domestic issues such as transparency and "outreach". LACRALO for self-assessment must take note that this change It could be driven by direct arguments to ALAC and the At community Large in your Wiki.If LACRALO had taken the position in favor of these modifications, we would have scored a success, and as a shows internal effectiveness (consultation and debate) and external (impact on policy documents). Not have done can be called "cost opportunity "or" the cost of doing. " So, looking back immediately to draw some lessons. Look to the future on this new basis: According to the new document, issues like CROPP left in the last priority band, while the first occupy WHOIS, IANA and contracts and agreements between ICANN obligated parties. Restart the survey should probably be driven by Humberto to our internal selection is based on the new priority points. Surely we can have differences - for example for us in general IDNs are not as vital as in other regions where prevail multiple alphabets - but no large deviations. Soiicito carefully to Dr. Humberto Carrasco and Lic.Maritza Yesenia Aguero, in their capacity respectively President and Secretary LACRALO, give formal entry to this comment and the proposal to then that just drift: subjecting discussion priorities LACRALO attention to the new list referred ALAC here and produce a new list of priorities and priority of LACRALO as a result of discussion. As a corollary, suspend the survey being done and make a new commo part of planning proecso indicated here. Best regards. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e226c10282.html --]]