[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Although my english is bad, I agree with Alexander. It will appear instead of direct action Group technician bond (TLG), habruna "response to a request for information ... ". Ie if there is a request for information not habrinformacin. And an action will not seem right preventive to corrective action on demand. Please read and comment. Best Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch Posted on: Sunday, November 24, 2013 3:25 pm To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Re: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group Colleagues, Case of the query to which this message refers is of importance relatively high. Try the amendments proposing ESTN the rules applicable to Liaison Group Technician (Technical Liaison Group or TLG). These amendments remove the contact person of the TLG Board decisions and other spaces. As a result, contact of the board with the technology is diluted and becomes too indirect. I wonder if you agree ESTN LACRALO opinin to issue a ALAC, and instruct our / as representatives to defend their vote against the proposed changes in the terms that describe the immediately. The alternative we propose is to continue studying the theme with an alternate solution to make cash without removing your TLG current function.The text I propose already subcomo Comment page Of ALAC and says: "I do not think this reform is going in a good direction. It makes the relationship of the Board with the technical community much more tenuous and indirect. ALAC representation as an Interrnet users (or voice, at least) Should be That concerned the Board in its May advance more debates and decisions Necessary technical without actually soliciting views before them, instead of having the Technical Liaison Group's voice as one more When decisions are being shaped, since the early stages. We run the risk of privileging representation and diversity in the composition of the Board while sacrificing the soundness of its decisions. The technical liaison not only acts as described - "watchdog" acting as a backstop against decisions Which Could Also be technically wrong but can push for more creative solutions to problems. It is not only the knowledge of the technology's constraints but the creativity based on the deep awareness of its potential That We Could all be losing. By removing the liaison instead of fixing it, May we be supporting an act of throwing away the baby with the bathwater. Let's not. " Stay tuned for your comments and your time in function of them solicitaraccin Presidency and Secretariat. Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff [staff@atlarge.icann.org] Sent: I saturday, November 23, 2013 6:42 To: alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group Dear All, Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, That you've asked to call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group < https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft can be found on the At-Large Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments function 06-Dec-2013 23:59 UTC. A vote is to commence after comments have been collected. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ab168ad8f1.html --]]