Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN Board Seat - seat 15th At large Board member
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ICANN Board Seat - seat 15th At large Board member From: apisan@unam.mx Vanda, thanks for this post. Stresses in the current election to Seat 15 harALAC the need to elect someone who really has clarity about the concept of conflict of interest, in addition to being exempt from them. It does not seem the case with the current occupant. I also seems necessary to emphasize, as I did today regarding LACRALO, a focus on the effectiveness of the organization. Transparency and participation must be innuendo at this point, and lots of participation is achieved by reducing the effectiveness not aumentndola. We are waiting for the Presidency of LACRALO plenum consultation in accordance with the regulations and statutes. Meanwhile, these messages serve to forming his judgment. Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Vanda Scartezini [vanda@uol.com.br] Posted on: Wednesdays, March 12, 2014 11:44 To: LACRALO Espaol; LACRALO list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] ICANN Board Seat - seat 15th At large Board member Dear friends LACRALO I was traveling and I was unable to attend this call today the morning. Still think I can share with you my views concerning what I hope a board member to represent us: - Have stature to represent all (having general knowledge - Gestin, finance etc but need not be a specialist - and knowledge of the affairs of constituintes dems to have a voice inside the baord) - International experience, - Knowledge of ICANN, - Participation in RALOS and At Large in general; - Experience of boards of the same economy tamaoy, - Ability to communication with people in ICANN, in various regions. - For me it is also more relevant knowledge of a language for ease of communication with the community at large. Few ms, the better. - Own positions related to users and capacity defend them. - Today, the Board remains relevant no conflict of relacina interest in new gTLDs.There are already many necessarily are conflicting experiences, they asque our representative in principle not be to be. I think also that the position should be rotating, I mean serious relevant candidates each have different choice for people percebn that tienn chance to play and win important positions to each flask. Hugs to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 On 11.03.14, 21:01, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Jos,
As the philosopher said, "ahestel detail."
Since it is a statutory obligation to consult before exercising this Important vote, introduce the friendly suggestion that you do with Clarity, order and fairness.
The Alan unexpected direct message to the list may indicate something Different. We do not entangle ms, hence my suggestion.
Best Regards
Alejandro Pisanty
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:38 PM, JosFrancisco Arce < Josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear >>,
To clarify the Cuestin >> I'm going to say that the mail Answer >> Alan >> went public and said that I personally am going to consult the region
You want to do, maybe in need living internal discussion Of >> A call (with one, some or all). Because >> I said was interpreted consult with you Several >> Things that led to the erroneous discussion. As I said to Alexander, Listen >> wants the region. Alan >> was the only candidate who was placed in direct contact with LACRALO >> members, but this does not mean to exclude others in a Future >> exchange ideas or questions. Now, if some of you were on the call of the Candidates, seems very good (but not all had that opportunity), But my mission is to try to give equal opportunities to all Members >> and perhaps many of those who did not want that option, I >> I can not rule >>. Tomorrow is not with the candidates but to know The >> Criteria >> must have the "ideal" candidate.
I repeat, we must provide opportunities for all members to access Direct >> (call) or indirect (mail or wiki) to interact with Candidates. It is an important desicin which should and must take LACRALO Be based on knowledge and argumentation of the positions, Only >> So the internal debate >> serel ms right, from my point of view.
Greetings >>
JosArce >> -.
11/03/2014 >> 18:10 GMT-03: 00 Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan@gmail.com> :
To be >>> clear, I was not asking for a teleconference.In a discussion With >> JosArce >>>, Jossuggested That I LACRALO members tell about me, and That >> Is >> Why >>> I sent the message.
Google >>> Translation: To be clear, I was not asking for a Conference >>>. In a discussion with JosArce, it Jossugirique I tell >> LACRALO >>> members on m, and that is why enviel message.
Alan >>>
At 3/11/2014 4:17 PM >>> Fatima Cambronero wrote:
Jos >>>> all,
I >>>> am not understanding very well what estplanteando tanks, which That >> Me >>>> leads me to several questions: By qutendramos only >>>> one with Alan call, which is one of the
Candidates, not the other four candidates? Qunecesitamos >>>> For additional call with a candidate when And >> Was >>>> A call with all the candidates, and there's another call tomorrow One >> Wiki >>>> that has been created to be able to ask questions of all Candidates >>>>?
If what is >>>> estconsultando is if we have a call Only >> Alan >>>> which is one of the candidates, I disagree. I think >> That >>
Must listen to all candidates equally. And if estconsultando >>>> if we have an additional call to LACRALO >>>> with all candidates personally do not see it necessary. In >> The >> Morning call >>>> there is no interpretation into Spanish, you can Participate >> Ally >>>> ask the questions that are deemed appropriate to direct The >> Vote >>>> then issue the LACRALO Chair on behalf of the region. Even if the dems >>>> LACRALO members understand that having this Call >> Additional >>>> necessary to issue his opinion, on with it.
Best regards, Fatima Cambronero >>>>
03/11/2014 >>>> 17:03 GMT-03: 00 <cveraq@gmail.com> :
[[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: ICANN Board Seat From: cveraq@gmail.com
Serious Call >>>>> Interesting and Timely
Carlos Vera Quintana >>>>> 0988141143 >>>>> Sgueme >>>>> @ cveraq
The >>>>>> 11.03.2014, at 14:49, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com>
Wrote:
Jos >>>>>>,
Good discussion points. Let us listen to the community.
Alejandro >>>>>> Pisanty
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, <josefranciscoarce@gmail.com>
Wrote:
> > > [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] > > Subject: Re: ICANN Board Seat > From: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com > > Dear Alexander, > > > Thanks for the Post. Yours is a proposal? We will consult The >> Same >>>> One >>>>> > The region and he acts conforne Remember >>>>>>> nothing That I defined it, only the region decisions Take >> > Florist. > Individual Members voting no child, but if the Chairman >>>> > Name > Region, Almost the Same. > Only If The region remains sable WANT A Call With Postulates >> > (MAYBE All >>>>>>> not want) Any proposal or Just Another Discuss >> THIS >>>> > In the Schedule. > > Regards >>>>>>> > > JosArce >>>>>>> > On 11 March 2014 14:46, "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch >> "< > Apisan@unam.mx> > Wrote: > > >> Jos, >> >> As the saying goes in Mexico, "or all or all coludos Rabones >>>> ". >> With qureglas or criteria, if there are no written rules, think That >> Is >>>> >> LACRALOb lead to the campaigns of competitors ALAC >> By >>>> The >>>>> >> Board Seat 15? These rules will have to be Fair, >> Transparent, and specific as to the result as the Member >>>> To >>>>> >> LACRALO are not direct voters in that election. >> Alejandro >>>>>>>> Pisanty >> >> --------------------------- >>>>>>>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >>>>>>>> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >>>>>>>> Av >>>>>>>>University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> >> >> +52-1-5541444475 >>>>>>>> FROM ABROAD >> >> FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM >>>>>>>> Join the group on LinkedIn, Http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >>>>>>>> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ >> Lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Jos >> Francisco Arce >>>>>>>> [josefranciscoarce@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:37 >> To: Alan Greenberg >> CC: LACRALO discussion list >> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN Board seat >> >> Dear Alan, all >> >> Thanks for your kind email, and let us know for your overall Background. I >>>>>>> >> The region will ask If They have questions or prefer personal Call >> With >>>>> >> To Have direct contacts you, after all the candidances review Profiles. >> Kind regards >>>>>>>> >> JosArce >>>>>>>> >> LACRALO Chair >> >> >> >> 11.03.2014 1:59 GMT-03: 00 Alan Greenberg < Greenberg.alan @ gmail.com >> : >> >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> I apologize for not being able to write in Both Spanish and Inglés >>>>. >>> >>> The At-Large Board member can not "represent" the ALAC or At-Large >>. Once >>>>> >>> Appointed, the principal is there purely on his / her own. However >>, We >> Were >>>>>>> >>> Given a seat on the Board to allow the issues relevant to Users >> To >> Be >>>> >>> Factored into the discussion.To do that, a person must be Selected >> Who >>>> Can >>>>>>> Represent Those >>>>>>>>> best interests. >>> My history ICANN >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> - 8 years as a volunteer to At-Large, 6 on the ALAC, 8 years Ace >> ALAC >>>> >>> Liaison to the GNSO. Also I have held several leadership Roles on >> The >>>> >> ALAC. >>> >>> - I have worked very hard to make respected Within At-Large ICANN >>. >>> >>> - I have been the principal author of many of the statements By issues >>>> The >>>>>>>> ALAC >>>>>>>>> over the last 8 years demonstrating my understanding of The >> Issues >>>>> >>> Important to At-Large. >>> >>> - Although I obviously do not agree with some ICANN Participants, I Have >>>>>>> >>> Good working relationships developed with people in many Diverse >> Areas >>>> > Of >>> ICANN. >>> >>> Professional background: >>> >>> - Over 30 years as a software developer and senior manager at McGill >>>> >>> University. >>> >>> - I was part of the small group That Brought the Internet to Canada >>>>. >>> >>> - I have a number of VOLUNTEERED in professional Organizations Prior >>>> To >>>>> >>> ICANN, including being a Board member for the Internet Society. >>> >>> - I spent 6 years as a volunteer to the Internet Society Working >> With >>>> > And Their running >>>>>>>>> then Network Training Courses for people from Develop developing >>>> >>> Countries. We trained people from over 140 countries country who Were Instrumental >>>>>>>> >>> In bringing the Internet to Their countries. Alumni include Government >>>> >>> Ministers, ICANN ICANN Board members and employees. Most Country clubs >> In >>>> >>> Central America, South America and the Caribbean and Attended Courses >>>> > In Spanish >>>>>>>>> Were Also run in South America. >>> >>> - After my retirement from McGill, I spent several years Consulting on >>>> The >>>>>>>> >>> Use of technology in developing economies (ICT4D), and worked In >> > Africa, >>> South Asia and Central America. >>> Strengths >>>>>>>>> related to the Board position: >>> >>> - I have a very strong understanding of ICANN and its various > Components, >>> Of At-Large, and of the needs of Internet users. >>> >>> - I have a proven Ability to not work with others, and to Influence >> > Outcomes. Generally >>>>>>>>> I am viewed as a thoughtful and articulate person, And >> I >> Am >>>> > In >> To >>> Very strong position to enter the Board and be Immediately Effective. Three >>>>>>>> >>> Of my references for my Expression of Interest for this Board Position >>>> Were >>>>>>>> >>> Current or former ICANN Board members, and Their endorsements Speak >> Well >>>>>>> >> To >>> My Ability to Quickly Become an Effective Board member. >>> >>> - My background with the ISOC Both training workshops and my ICT4D >> >>> Consulting have made me acutely aware of the issues That are Important >>>> > In >>> The Developing World. >>> >>> - I am free of any Relationship with Those who stand to make Money >> Off >>>> > Of >>> ICANN's decisions, and will not have any Conflicts in carrying Out >> My >>>> >>> Mandate. >>> >>> - My track record of dedication (Both in time and effort) to ICANN >> And >>>> At-Large is >>>>>>>>> Well Known, and I will put the same energy into Presenting >>>> The >>>>>>>> >>> Needs of users on the Board. >>> >>> I do not believe any other candidate can That match all of my >>> Qualifications and I will not only be a good Board member, But an >> Outstanding >>>>>>>>> At-Large Board member. >>> >>> If I am selected, I can make a number of Commitments: >>> >>> - I promise to stay in touch With the ALAC and At-Large RALOs >>, Through >>>>> >>> Both face-to-face meetings and teleconferences. That is the Only >> Way >>>> To >>>>> >>> Ensure That I am aware of issues important to At-Large. >>> >>> - Regularly You will hear from me about Board activities and My >> >>> Participation, and raising issues That I Believe That At-Large May >> Want >>>>> >> To >>> Focus on. >>> >>> - I will work to make sure That the bottom-up nature of ICANN Is >> Preserved >>>>>>>> >>> In fact and not only in words.This is key to ICANN's Ability To >> > Continue >>> To exist and meet its Obligations. >>> >>> - While on the Board, I will work hard to Increase its Transparency, To >>>>> That users >>>>>>>>> make sure issues are considered, and to Ensure more >>> Participation in ICANN from people who are not funded by Companies >> And >>>> Who >>>>>>>> >>> Do not speak Inglés. Both of These Were important Proposals That I >> Fought >>>>>>>> >>> For in the ATRT2 Report (http://www.icann.org/en/ >>> About/aoc-review/atrt/final-recommendations-31dec13-en.pdf or Http://www.icann.org/es/about/aoc-review/atrt/final- >>>>>>>>> >>> Recommendations-31dec13-en.pdf, page 9-11, section 10.3 and 10.5) >>> >>> I will be happy to answer any questions. >>> >>> Regards, Alan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list Lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>>>>>> >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >> >> >> >> - >> Arce, JosF. Http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz >>>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss-en mailing list Lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>>>>> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > >
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b9048235fd.html --]]
participants (1)
-
apisan＠unam.mx