[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Voto ALAC sobre KSK Desde:Vanda Scartezini <vanda@etges.com.br> <translate text> estiamdos I already had the opportunity to express my opinion but I repeat it here: I am a Please implement the key rollover around June: My reasons: a) if your domain is not under the DNSSEC per hour nothing you fear- it will not break er your connection. The tests that we must circulate as wide as possible in our countries they help everyone to perceive whether they are there or not. b) If you are under DNSSEc then you have to know from an access provider if it is Tá compliance with the latest version of DNSSEC. If you are not doing it until June. Still, if you're not under DNSSEC it's time to find another provider I'm sure, after I've been done the rollover of the key. Ai then you will be safer On 4/6/18, 5:37 PM, "lac-discuss-en on behalf of Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <l ac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of myaguero@msn.com

wrote:

[[--Translated text (en -> en) -]] [[-This message had format issues and was not defined properly--]] Subject: Re: Vote ALAC on KSK From: "Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero@msn.com> Dear Humberto, Thank you very much for your indications. Dear ICANN Staff, Please create the respective wiki. We will be responsible for placing t he comments made on the wiki to be created. The motion sent by Alejandro Pisanty is that of April 4 and is as follo ws: "From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> On behalf of Alejandro Pisanty Sent on: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 03:13 pm To: LACRALO <lac-discuss-es @ atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Vote ALAC on KSK Colleagues, at https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace % 3A + Plan + to + Restart + the + Root + Key + Signing + Key +% 28KSK% 29 + Rollover + Process you can see what that ALAC will vote to express the opinion of the users about the KSK process, which we know is the rotation of the "keys" of the PKI system (public key cryptography) of the DNSSEC system that protects th e domain name system (DNS) against some significant attacks. The text does not include the proposal that we made here in LACRALO tha t the ALSs assume a role in the dissemination of this process among ISPs, or ther providers, civil society, technical community and governments within ur reach. Moreover, said text was included in a preliminary version and eli minated in the end. Eliminating the co-responsibility of the ALS puts us again in the role of petitioners who do not contribute with their own decision ion to the security, stability and robustness of the DNS, the primary respo niable of ICANN. For this reason, I call on our ALAC representatives to insist on the in clusion of this text and, if it is not achieved, vote against the approval of the proposed text. Consider this proposal as a formal motion and proceed in abbreviated time so that it can be decided before the ALAC vote. If the se are not possible, be ex post-facto as a protest. Alejandro Pisanty " Also, as indicated by Humberto, starting today and until Wednesday, Apr il 11 at 23:59 UTC, the deadline to submit comments is opened. Thank you. Regards, Maritza From: lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> or n behalf of Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 03:28 pm To: Alejandro Pisanty CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann .org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Vote ALAC on KSK Dear Alejandro, I would like to apologize. For professional reasons, I was appointed by the rector of the University where I work as a member of the negotiating c ommittee before a union. I have spent in extensive meetings in another city than the one I live in (Antofagasta), which is where meetings take place. I have not had the op portunity to meet your requirements and those of the region as I would have liked. These meetings last from 8 to 10 hours a day. Only yesterday evenin g, I was able to return to the city and the other week I should continue li ke this.This until April 23 in principle. As you will understand my work have prevented me from react ing with the urgency you suggest. Our participation in Lacralo is voluntary .Even the staff knows that I have not been able to answer as I usually do because I'm just locked in a room arguing before a union. Of course I would like to dedicate myself exclusively to this. Unfortun ately, our reality prevents it. In spite of the above, we will submit your motion to 5 days of discussi on starting today and if we achieve consensus we will transmit it ex-post. The deadline is Wednesday, April 11 at 23:59 UTC. If there is no consensus, We will have to take a vote whose details will be communicated between Tue sday and Wednesday of next week because we must coordinate with the staff I have a vote For now let's follow the debate in this way. I will ask our secretary or paste the comments on the wiki. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Catholic University of the North - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University or f London PhD University of Edinburgh On 06-04-2018, at 17:03, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote: Humberto, The ratification of my motion occurred moments after I presented it, wi th the comment in favor that Vanda transmitted. The rest of the time that h as passed is the responsibility of the Presidency and the Secretariat. Alx 2018-04-06 14:54 GMT-05: 00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> : Dear Alejandro, This mail then is a ratification of your motion. I'm right? regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Catholic University of the North - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University or f London PhD University of Edinburgh On 06-04-2018, at 04:51 PM, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote: Humberto, We will look forward to the details. In my original motion I stressed t I have shortness of deadlines. Given that the ALAC deadlines are overcoming, ad herence to the procedures will make it difficult to give a formal mandate t or our ALAC representatives, who will have the option to vote in conscience. Anticipating that you would not organize the procedure on time, my motion g ives the alternative to manifest ex-post. Dev's objection ratifies what I oppose: ALSs do not assume responsibili ties, they only serve as petitioners. This deepens the arguments that are a dvanced against the community At Large as a whole. Dev's expression subvert s the analysis and goodwill shown in Alan Greenberg's extensive explanation. The ALS that act with responsibility for the users, as Vanda has expressed thirst very well, will continue to have to act outside and in spite of LACRALO , before the silence of the dozens of organizations whose existence only ma nifests itself to vote and fly.Hopefully, in the future, the ALAC represents tation will bring these matters to the forum in a timely manner without hav ing to wait for the ALSs to present them. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-04-06 9:59 GMT-05: 00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrasco@cmsz.cl> : Dear Alberto, You're right. We will give you a motion for a motion and we will put it to a vote. During the day I will point out more details. regards Sent from my iPhone On 04-06-2018, at 11:56 AM, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wr ote: Dear Humberto, although I am opposed to this motion, that means that if There is a vote, I will vote against it. But I think it's a formal motion, which should be treated as such, despite the lack of participation commented. Who requests it and Aida, they agree. Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> OR n behalf of Alejandro Pisanty Sent on: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 03:13 pm T or: LACRALO <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-e n] Vote ALAC on KSK Colleagues, at https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace % 3A + Plan + to + Restart + the + Root + Key + Signing + Key +% 28KSK% 29 + Rollover + Process you can see what that ALAC will vote to express the opinion of the users about the KSK process, which we know is the rotation of the "keys" of the PKI system (public key cryptography) of the DNSSEC system that protects th e domain name system (DNS) against some significant attacks. The text does not include the proposal that we made here in LACRALO tha t the ALSs assume a role in the dissemination of this process among ISPs, or ther providers, civil society, technical community and governments within ur reach. Moreover, said text was included in a preliminary version and eli minated in the end. Eliminating the co-responsibility of the ALS puts us again in the role of petitioners who do not contribute with their own decision ion to the security, stability and robustness of the DNS, the primary respo niable of ICANN. For this reason, I call on our ALAC representatives to insist on the in clusion of this text and, if it is not achieved, vote against the approval of the proposed text. Consider this proposal as a formal motion and proceed in abbreviated time so that it can be decided before the ALAC vote. If the se are not possible, be ex post-facto as a protest. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr.Alejandro Pis anty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 B log:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisan LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisan LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisan ty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A1 06C0C8614 Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, ht tp: // www. isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Virus free www.avast.com _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/ mailman / listinfo / lac-discuss-enhttp://www.lacralo.org http: //www.lacralo.o http://www.lacralo.o rg - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr.Alejandro Pis anty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 B log:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisant LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisant and Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A10 6C0C8614 Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, htt p: //www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LinkedIn:http://www.linked in.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/ e / gis / 22285 / 4A106C0C8614 Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org. . .. . . . . . . . . . . Join the UN AM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twit ter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: //www.isoc. ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc. org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty --- - >> Join ISOC Mexico, http : //www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .---- >> Join ISOC Mexic or,http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pis anty School of Chemistry UNAM Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 B log:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisant LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisant and Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A10 6C0C8614 Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, htt p: //www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LinkedIn:http://www.linkedi n.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e / gis / 22285 / 4A106C0C8614 Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join I SOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UN AM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twit ter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: //www.isoc. ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc. org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty --- - >> Join ISOC Mexico, http : //www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .---- >> Join ISOC Mexico ,http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b6ef0f2f9d.html -]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a90c7b43e2.html --]]