[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Q = iso-8859-1 BFtriunfo_por_aclamaci = F3n = 3F = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dear Leon and all. For various reasons the chain of events was overcome. Those reasons are attributable to Humberto and me, and are both professional and private major in both cases. Then after that period, we talked with Humberto and noticed that not habamos made the ballot. Voting For? Because there is no reglamentacin to tell us to do in the case of one candidate. Background cases have equal, ie presentation of a single candidate for office: Natalia, and Humberto and mo in the last I votaciny think there were any more. Now we proceeded in the same way, ie Voting call, although we followed the chronology of events. What we coordinate with the Staff and aslo did. Our irregularity can be with dates, not the procedure. Quejcuando we not inform anyone on the ballot. I formalized complaints to the Staff for having sought, received and make publish an SOI and an additional document, then open the ballot. This Is To is an irregularity which did not have an answer. Because I think irregular? Because the first was made explicit by the applicant in our monthly meeting in the day yesterday. In this presentation we heard a Profile of a businessman (ISP) and also President of the Chamber afna activity. Many have considered a conflict of interest with the end user and did notice. Then he asks the applicant for Staff enviaclaraciones part of that, and tells him estfaltando to complete their profile. And this is a serious irregularity. And msan when the ballot and estabierta. Now someone saw the post as Staff to aclamacin resolved in a date subsequent to that chain of events, but before the call to Voting. This is another serious irregularity. Leon, for the cases cited as precedents nor was opposition, if We consult the list and realizla ballot. Also, strange me cumplitodo say that. Cunaod you collaborated with me in a monthly meeting (I think in Los Angeles), I wanted to go ahead and as Secretary of the meeting told me that we can not move forward without taking list Well, comply with the procedure and we list, then seguadelante. I Believe loso that in all cases we must follow procedures, and if there are none, take history (custom, another source of law) and proceed Likewise. To provide transparency, the ballot must be done, because only cumplitbNL> presentaciny process multiple media. There was no aclamacin or requested or written by anyone LACRALO other irregularity. We have been criticized for lack of transparency because the Secretary Staff envial personally and not translated two lines in a document. Those lines were not even in a single background. best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Len Felipe Sanchez Amba Posted on: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:37 pm To: Sergio Bronstein CC: LACRALO Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] aclamacin win? Dear All, Coming late to the discussion wanted to make some considerations. First, I believe that we must analyze the chain of events under the dates related. In the wiki own timetable is set for the Selection of LACRALO ALAC members. In him, we can see that the chain Events are desarrollde follows: 30 April- Announcement of invitation and call for nominations April 30 to 9 May- period for nominations 16 May- Date limit for acceptance of nominations by Nominees 18 to 25 May- Realization of elections if there is more than one nominee (situation that did not occur in this occasion) In response to this calendar Lance Hinds and being the sole candidate of the region, I see as an act of influence by the Staff that Lance has settled that had been the winner of the election. Perhaps trmino By aclamacinno is adequate but to be honest I do not remember seeing any opposition on the list during the period of nominations. Therefore, I do not consider what was done by the staff in performing their work support the ALAC and RALOs must be taken as misconduct or bad faith or with intent to any manipulation. That's my impression.If the communication had before the expiry of the periods completed, another will be my opinion. Do Not being as, it seems unfair to label irregular work performed Staff. However, as to the designation of Lance as representative LACRALO to ALAC, I think the process is exhausted timely manner and therefore it does not know where this comes ballot. In any case, if claimed irregularities, it seems to me that this process will lack of Voting sustenance and therefore I will seem irregular. By qunadie ms postul? By nominating another postulate qunadie ms person? I support the designation of Lance not only because I worked with him but because I believe that the processes were accomplished and what is today extemporneo doing is not only lacking but besides livelihood. Cheers, Len On 21/07/2015, at 17:19, Sergio Bronstein <bronstein.sergio@gmail.com <mailto:bronstein.sergio@gmail.com> > Wrote: Good afternoon Alberto and Humberto It seems that several members of Lacralo that we disagree with the use of the concept "by aclamacin". In this regard, I call on those who represent us to transmit to the staff an order of explanations for this typical, since its use seems inappropriate when several have voted against. Say "aclamacin" makes a huge majority see it was not such; is engaosos use and, therefore transparent. a hug, Sergio Bronstein Vice-president Internauta Venezuela The July 21, 2015, 17:18, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> > Wrote Hello Alberto and Humberto, especially, but also Silvia Vivanco and Heidi Ulrich, can someone explain quen https://community.icann.org/m/mobile.action#page/51413146 Lance Hinds GanAbout reprsentante choice for the ALAC ** BY ACLAMACIN **? The evidence of irregularities supported by ICANN staff builds precipitously. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 <tel:%2B52-1-5541444475> FROM ABROAD +525541444475 <tel:%2B525541444475> +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO <tel:%2B525541444475> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com <http://pisanty.blogspot.com/> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f54b272e79.html --]]