Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Hi Carlton. In this case you can ask for a vote for the interpretation of the norm, not as a candidate for confirmation? Not the same, no? Forgiveness for my ignorance, what is the standard aaplicar? Best Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of carlton.samuels @ gmail.com Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:51 am To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) From: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com On Thu, August 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> wrote:
the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.
As the presiding officer, the President's chief function is to interpret the rules but not carte blanche. l is limited by the ROP in the first instance. Aquestlo good. Each member of the other also has a right unrestricted to interpret those rules. And since our propsitos, the President is and should be a member in common, any other member has the right to challenge every interpretation of the Presidency. Aquviene good. Each member has the absolute right to request all the other members of his point of view. We call a vote. I say again, if you cayperjudicado by the Declaration, then there a remedy. Exercise if necessary. - CAS ============================== Carlton Samuels A Mobile: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, planning, government, Evaluaciny deadlines * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d8ad9d2f42.html --]]
Hi Alberto: No troubles at all. In this case the request to the Secretariat is just that: a general assembly of members be instituted to resolve the issue on a vote. The motion that accompanies the request will give the reason and should have two distinct elements. # 1 should be a statement - 'resolved' - that the Chair's interpretation of the LACRALO Rules of Procedure #8 pertaining to the residency qualification for election to the ALAC be repudiated. Part 2 requests that Humberto Carrasco is recognized as a qualified candidate. Cheers, - Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:06 PM, <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Hi Carlton. In this case you can ask for a vote for the interpretation of the norm, not as a candidate for confirmation? Not the same, no? Forgiveness for my ignorance, what is the standard aaplicar? Best Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of carlton.samuels @ gmail.com Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:51 am To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
[[- Translated text (in -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) From: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com
On Thu, August 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> wrote:
the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.
As the presiding officer, the President's chief function is to interpret the rules but not carte blanche. l is limited by the ROP in the first instance.
Aquestlo good. Each member of the other also has a right unrestricted to interpret those rules.
And since our propsitos, the President is and should be a member in common, any other member has the right to challenge every interpretation of the Presidency.
Aquviene good. Each member has the absolute right to request all the other members of his point of view. We call a vote.
I say again, if you cayperjudicado by the Declaration, then there a remedy. Exercise if necessary.
- CAS
============================== Carlton Samuels A Mobile: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, planning, government, Evaluaciny deadlines * ============================= _______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d8ad9d2f42.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
participants (2)
-
asoto＠ibero-americano.org -
Carlton Samuels