[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Net Neutrality From: vanda@uol.com.br Sergio, I agree with you. To my neutrality is not free for all or even the same service independent price is offered. The access to state services should be available at the same Prices for all ie if one pays 2 dieros to have a band 10 Mega Wide neighbor must have the same band on the same 2 dieros. What worries me in the discussion of neutrality is not only the cost, concern is control by the tráfego telecoms happens in their capes, ie not want an internet only will the rich and the TV cab or only what is commercial interest of the TVs come available to users again as cable TV. And it is this that was by behind Verizon discussions with the FCC. Aesta the danger to users, in my opinion. Hugs Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av.Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 2/27/15, 10:06 am, "Sergio Bronstein" <bronstein.sergio@gmail.com> wrote:

Buenos das tod @ s

It is absolutely true that our obligation as representatives of Users is defending the right of free use of the Internet, but I I risk To disagree on the concept of neutrality as estpensando today.

I'm going to the concrete. Today, telco operators are investing Networks on passing the content that users Should have free access.Any study that is reviewed, demostrarque Curve investments (fixed network, mobile, equipment and software) That These companies make their networks (which must withstand every day Ms transfer large files) estcerca to meet the Curve of income; in short, the "business" of the telco, such As esthoy, no sotiene.

Meanwhile, there is a group of companies (search engines, generators, Content distributors, social networks, etc., each das ms Concentrated and powerful, who make it their business to travs networks by Which do not pay a penny.

Questions from users optics are then:

1. Who pagarpor networks in the future? The states? We must stop States say how much, when, where, what, a quin conectarny with Qutarifas?

2. We must deliver operational and network expansion by the Google, Facebook, Netflix? And if it happens again ask to quin Conectarna customers or users, they can pay or not.

3.Does Netflix and similar no charge for download content but not Collaborating on the development of networks? how actuarn when adueen Of the operators?

Our main lines of work should remain inclusion in its More broadly (ie, connectivity and knowledge for use), besides Free access and circulation of information, and in this sense, the question Will:

4. New dueos networks garantizarn this to happen, or Privilegiarna customers before users?

I think if we do not have clear answers to these questions, our Must be vigilant, lest it be that a small group of corporations Business whoever decides about our rights and our Freedoms.

I leave for discussion, which ojalse of.

Greetings to tod @ s,

Sergio Bronstein President Internauta Venezuela On 02/26/2015 21:21, "Alberto Soto" <asoto@ibero-americano.org> i wrote:

...

It is a measure ojalprospere and an example for governments Our Regin:

Http://goo.gl/Rjmc7H

Best Regards

Alberto Soto

--- Avast antivirus software scanned this e-mail in For viruses. Http://www.avast.com _______________________________________________ Lac-discuss-en mailing list Lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

Http://www.lacralo.org

_______________________________________________ Lac-discuss-en mailing list Lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

Http://www.lacralo.org

_______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4fbf408ce6.html --]]