[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Public comment closes 24 MAR 17 Desde: antelizalexis@gmail.com Thank you very much Alberto in ICANN58 I witnessed both times, I think is fair and need to expand, improve and above all outline the role of both instances users face. It is imperative plans, programs are known, actions, results. That is, optimize mechanisms to ensure effective and active participation of both instances. Which may well be complementary and not necessarily mutually exclusive. Greetings Alexis Anteliz / Fellowship Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the Public Comment At-Large Review by the company ITEMS. There were two papers entries, the first draft and ninety pages then it is containing the sixteen recommendations. The opinion on the latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft. Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document It is containing the sixteen recommendations. LACRALO will be inserted on these recommendations, as They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your opinion public comment, I tried a few minutes ago. In actually he had prepared personal comments on both documents. My surprise when entering the link, which can only opinarse was through a form "limited" opinion only comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment. This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims uninvestigated directly in fact, it is not feasible and can be observed pourable opinion on it. We must remember that no public comment was restricted to a form, let alone without the possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form. Unfortunately too late, this period is already closed. I will try to form making a general comment, not particularly about each recommendation, because I think it is an important limitation to our freedom of opinion. The link in question: < https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ...> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge- review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf Best regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c3c11c84e5.html --]]