[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:?????? = Utf-8 q Cerraerdo_comentario_p = C3 = BAblico_24-M = q = utf-8-17_de AR =? Desde: vanda@scartezini.org Very Good Aida. I think we did a good job. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. HAPPY 2017! From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> On Behalf of Aida Noblia <aidanoblia@gmail.com> Date: Friday, March 24, 2017 at 5:47 PM To: Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> Cc: "lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Cerraerdo public comment 24-MAR-17 Thanks Alberto. Indeed, if there was doubt I sent my mail.I think it's good to see that there are many people involved and supports, as you mention. regards On 24 March 2017, 13:09, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org<mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > He wrote: Well dear, I sent the mail, and a response to be received confirmed. There it is clear that the opinion sent will be placed on the site web, unrestricted access. I suggest that those who have not yet participated, do so before 2300 UTC Today through a mail to comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org <mailto:comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org> One way is to support the opinion expressed in the report of LACRALO, and / or supporters poured into the ALAC response, or both at the same mail. Your cooperation is very important. Best regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- an From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On behalf of Alberto copse Posted on: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:08 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Cerraerdo public comment 24-MAR-17 Dear Olivier, thank you again. LACRALO struggled to leave their comment on these forms, and apparently there were several with the same problem. Harold imagine mailing it ended. I also am using that route. It strikes me that on an issue like this, this process is used: fixed form (with problems) and mail. And the public says no access to the rest of the comments, nor made in the form or mailed is very rare .... Best regards Alberto Soto -----Original message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On behalf of ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> Posted on: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: Closed public comment 24-MAR-17 [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Closed public comment 24-MAR-17 From: ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> Dear Alberto, ALS and At-Large members are encouraged to respond directly to the email inquiry to: comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org <mailto:comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org> The deadline for commenting directly on March 24, 2017 23:59 GMT But the ALAC and RALO leaders have also prepared comments obtained Consensus discussions. Drafts of these comments have been And circulated. The comment THIN taken directly input all particularly the work of the working group and can LACRALO RALOS found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch OPA / edit? Usp = sharing Statement ALAC \\ u200b \\ u200bcon was developed several applications entrance to the community and its latest draft is attached. I understand that both states are now frozen - that is completed, unless someone points a factual error. ALS are encouraged to support the ALAC and RALO statements, but They are also encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using the template. Best regards, Olivier In 23/3/2017 2:09, asoto@ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:

Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the

There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p then containing the recommendations is sixteen.

The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft.

Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document contains recommendations is sixteen.

LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list.

As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually Be prepared to personal comments on both documents.

My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment.

This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n on it.

We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form.

Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way making a general comment, not particularly about each RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our freedom of opinion.

The link in question: <

lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf>

ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf

http://www.gih.com/ocl.html [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1784655ae5.html --]]