[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Closing report Overhaul ALAC - until the 30 of September From: sylvia@internautabrasil.org Considered members of the LACRALO, I have offered myself like volunteer to let arrive and know your opinion them on the report Overhaul of the Advisory Committee of AT-Large. This report is open to commentaries until the 30 of September. I consider the participation of all the ALS of our region important before this date, since once approved we will not be able to change nothing and deciciones taken here, will affect without place to doubt, the relation of their ALS towards ALAC and ICANN. The historico of this process can be leido in Spanish in http://www.icann.org/es/reviews/alac /, The report that is open to consultation it can read in their totality also in SPANISH in http://www.icann.org/es/reviews/alac/final-report-alac-review-28jan09-es.pdf , the document has 44 pages in where a complete radigrafía becomes of ALAC and occur advice of how improving the operation of the same one. A Wiki page exists where any member of the community can postar its commentary. In it is page and of form to summarize the things 3 questions become single and they propose a system to us of qualification from 1 to 3, according to the importance, being 1 the one of greater importance. QUESTIONS: * so important what is a given element of the review? * Create you who some of the propose actions does not constitute one correct answer to a given recommendation? If therefore it considers it, of what acción(es) treats and why? * There is some element of the Closing report that is not considered in the Review of the Plan? Of having it, which is? I invite them to that they write directly in pag Wiki, https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?at_large_review_implementation_outl ine_al_alac_st_0909_1_es or to that their commentaries envien to me so that between allwe pruned to give to seem of the LACRALO! THEY ARE 13 RECOMNEDACIONES, To WHICH WE MUST GIVE A QUALIFICATION THEM OF 1 A 3! As a example, and in my personal opinion, the recoemdación N° 4 wouldhave to have qualification: 1 "the education and participation must constitute an immediate priority stops Structures AT-Large (ALSes); the fulfillment must be an objective a long term." although I believe that it does not have to be long term, but that we must begin already, And YOU, WHAT YOU THINK? The delay of your commentaries so far, I take leave. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________ Sylvia Herlein Leite Brazil Internaut _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/798be98828.html --]]
participants (1)
-
sylvia@internautabrasil.org