Dev, gracias por esta valiosa información. El mundo de las iniciales de dos letras es más móvil que lo que se piensa frecuentemente; y los cambios son trascendentales, cuando se presentan. Por esto este tema debe interesar a aquellos colegas de LACRALO que han dado importancia a temas territoriales. Sólo con su iniciativa será posible que nuestra comunidad emprenda algo en el tema. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ Desde: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de devtee@gmail.com [devtee@gmail.com] Enviado el: viernes, 11 de julio de 2014 07:59 Hasta: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list Asunto: Re: Re "Introducción de dos caracteres de nombres de dominio en el Nuevo gTLD Namespace" Los comentarios del público [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Re "Introducción de dos caracteres de nombres de dominio en el Nuevo gTLD Namespace" Los comentarios del público De: devtee@gmail.com Bueno, sólo puede haber un número fijo de permutaciones (676) para su posible utilizar en la norma ISO 3166 desde ISO 3166 sólo puede ser letras ASCII de AA a ZZ. Y Si bien puede no ser un número rápido de cambios, se han producido cambios ISO 3166 en los últimos 10 años. Por ejemplo, en 2010, por ejemplo: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_3166-1_newsletter_vi-8_split_of_the_dutch_antille... BQ, CW y SX se añadieron para Bonaire, San Eustaquio y Saba, Curaçao y Sint Maarten (parte neerlandesa) en el Caribe. Dev Anand El Jueves, 10 de julio 2014 a las 8:47 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> escribió:

Closely reasoned and from the principle of cc assignment certainly worthy of the ALAC's consideration.

While we're at it, lets consider that 3-character country codes are possible.

Giving protection for a future event suggests we have a definite knowledge of country/territory breakdown and thusly, possible code assignment. Tying up all permutations of 2 characters especially when you consider IDNs would be a tough sell.

Carlton ---------'--------''-----

On Jul 10, 2014 2:04 AM, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Regarding the public comment on "Introduction of Two-Character Domain

Names

...

in the New gTLD Namespace" at https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg which ends July 10 2014, I've posted the following at https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg for consideration:

"Various registries for multiple gTLDs are applying for exceptions to Specification 5, Section 2 of the New gTLD Registry Agreement ("Specification 5") with some registries suggesting the release of 2 character ASCII labels not on the current ISO 3166 standard would suffice.

While this seems harmless, there is a possibility of new countries and territories being created, and then allocated a new two character ASCII label by ISO 3166/MA (see

https://web.archive.org/web/20111101141651/http://www.iso.org/iso/country_co...

...

).

Any new country or territory created after 2014 would therefore not receive the same protection as those in the 2014 ISO 3166-2 list and would find that their new 2 character label is "given away", should they wish for their 2 character ASCII label to be protected, as per Specification 5.

Now, should the principle established by Specification 5 protecting 2 character ASCII labels even be in the New gTLD Registry Agreement? Many would say, especially given the prevalence of two character labels in existing TLDs like .com, .org and .net that this principle shouldn't be applied to new gTLDs. However, this (IMO) is a separate issue to the question being asked for in the public comment.

If Specification 5 is meant to defend the principle that country codes in ISO 3166-2 should be protected in new gTLDs, then it should be enforced to ensure future countries and territories with new 2 character ASCII labels are protected in the same way as those territories and countries in today's ISO 3166-2 list.

Therefore, the proposals by Donuts for 143 of its new gTLDS, .kred by KredTLD Pty Ltd, .best by BestTLD Pty Ltd and .ceo by CEOTLD Pty Ltd. should be turned down in keeping with the principle of Specification 5.

The proposal by .wiki by Top Level Design LLC which specifies that the two character ASCII labels will only be used for languages identified by ISO 639-1 does appear to meet the threshold that the use will not be confused with the corresponding country codes, as per Specification 5 and could be approved.

Similarly, the proposal by .globo by Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A which proposed the use of two character ASCII labels that are not letters or by two characters where only one of the character is a letter are labels that would not be used by ISO 3166-2 and could be approved."

Thoughts?

Kind Regards,

Dev Anand Teelucksingh _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2fe20b851c.html --]]