[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: We agree with Sergio Salinas From: presidencia@internauta.org.ar Dear Vanda: I'll try to be clear, anyone know (by knowledge or usual) that two characters are used to demarcate the ccTLD. Many times in ICANN (not always tell), are discussing what want to do business, maybe it's time to start thinking about how these changes would impact on end users. We, the end users, who usually know (except for rare exceptions, such as you name in your example) gTLDs are three or more ccTLD characters and two-character A ccTLD default allows us users know what law governs these domains, in terms of rights and obligations and gives us some kind of quiet as to how to manage with regard to this as recognize to be clear rules. The use of two characters in a NgTLD may cause some kind of confusion about this and put in a "uncomfortable" place (to call somehow) to Internet users. The table on the ISO 3166 Alpha-2 -1 indicates that there are certain characters that were not yet used, but I believe these can be used by countries or new territories at some point and should not be given to anyone. I always remember how the world has changed after the fall of the wall and before as well and have changed the map of the world, what I consider when I was a child is no longer the case and I have seen how countries called for now call a form from another or other countries that formed today are separate and distinct called, so that the table and following two characters must be preserved for what it was created: a standard providing international codes for country names and other administrative units to define level domain names geographic superior and not to do business with some enterprising a little money in their pockets. I hope to be clear ... although this is quite complex. A dear friend hug * Sergio Salinas Porto Argentina President Internauta Argentina Association of Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar> FLUI American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilatin.org> facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> & sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII> twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas> Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto < https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts> Hangout: presidencia@internauta.org.ar <Hangout%3Apresidencia@internauta.org.ar> / Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto> Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto> Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 * * "Hopefully we can be disobedient, whenever we received orders humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo Galeano * The August 14, 2014, 18:26, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@uol.com.br> wrote:

Déjame entender. Estamos hablando de según nivel de nombres de dominio. Los ccTLD y otros gTLDs ya los están utilizando. Como aqui en Brasil hay, por ejemplo: @ ....bb.br para los bancos en Brasil. No creo que permitir a los demás con respectiva negociación con el dueno de los dos caracteres, sea diverso do que ya ocurre. Negar es tener un tratamiento diverso en el mercadeara grupos que disputan el mismo mercado, lo que no me parece justo. Para mi esto no es lo mismo que tener .amazon o .patagonia y si es lo mismo que tener - y nosotros o siquiera nuestros países contestaron - amazon.com o patagonia.com Es una cuestión de ser justo y tener la misma regla a todos. O a mi ver obrigamos a todos los que ya utilizan 2 caracteres ascii a cancelar estos nombres de según nivel. Agradezco si me convencen del contrarioŠ Abrazos

Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464

On 8/12/14, 13:23, "Cristian Casas" <cristiancasas@hotmail.com> wrote:

...

Coincidimos con Sergio Salinas Porto en especial a la sugerencia de que el voto sea negativo, ya que sobre esto y en otros temas similares nos hemos manifestado varias organizaciones en LACRALO con respecto a los ngtld y su relación con códigos de país o regiones geográficas (casos: patagonia., .amazonas, .cba.y anexamos la disputa por el mal uso de la lista de ISO 3166-MA en el caso .fk y .gs).

Cristian Casas _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9e2d20b1d0.html --]]