Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: ELECTIONS LACRALO
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: ELECTIONS LACRALO From: apisan@unam.mx Silvia, For my part my requests are very clear and do not concern the ICANN staff at this time, that is apart from JosArce conduction of the election process, a report of its activities to allow evaluate and shape the Decision of the vote clarify whether Sern electoral choices "back / abstention" or "pro / abstention / Against", and that participants convene independent LACRALO lead to the choice of ICANN staff the (s) meeting (s) of discussion with the choice candidates. None of these are against the rules written and, if adopted in time, would have contributed to the transparency and legitimacy of the choice. If at this time the Sunday before the week's first debate we do not have the time to do so has passed. Thanks for your offer and intervencin. Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of silvia.vivanco @ icann.org [silvia.vivanco @ ICANN . org] Posted on: Sunday, March 10, 2013 21:27 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: ICANN At-Large Staff; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECTIONS LACRALO [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] Subject: Re: RES: ELECTIONS LACRALO From: silvia.vivanco @ icann.org Dear Vanda, et all, I would like to ask if there are any particular circumstance and that deserves especfica electoral process LACRALO cuestin please. As my e-mail explaining earlier, ICANN staff has been the upgrade of the WIKI, both Mailists monitoring and working with the secrete of LACRALO and Chairman, that the process is transparent, fair and all LACRALO members had the opportunity to submit nominations, candidate support, etc. The process takes place eleccin according to LACRALO CURRENT ROPs (for good or bad), this is what has LACRALO right now, and this is the procedure estsiguiendo. ICANN staff this your disposal so that the electoral process can move forward. Thank you! Best regards, Silvia Silvia Vivanco Manager At-Large Regional Affairs Internet corporation for Asignacin Names and numbers (ICANN) Telephone: + 1 (202) 570-7119 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Cell / Mvil: +1 (202) 735-7011 ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of vanda@uol.com.br Posted on: Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:02 A: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: ICANN At-Large; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS [[- Text Translation An (en -> en) -]] Subject: Re: RES: ELECTIONS LACRALO From: vanda@uol.com.br In these cases, I think it is wise to consult lawyers Icann because we are part of the structure of ICANN (ICANN pay our costs) to avoid problems, and we had plenty of LACRALO. I think Dr. Alexander has the knowledge to do it, aslo ask you did this before the end of this consultation process. Hugs Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone On 03.08.2013, at 20:15, Johnny Laureano <johnnylaureano@yahoo.com> wrote:
Estimados compañeros de LACRALO, Staff ICANN,
Es dificil pasar por alto los comentarios respecto de la legitimidad de este proceso eleccionario, me recuerda que se ha experimentado antes y lo doloroso que son estos procesos para todos.
Es por ello, de ser posible, sea oportuno aperturar por una semana el registro de candidatos para este proceso eleccionario y conformar un comité electoral, tal lo planteado por el Dr. Pisanty, me parece sensato y razonable.
Una apertura a estas dos acciones, coadyuvará a la legitimidad de los resultados.
Johnny Laureano AUI PERU - ALS
--- On Fri, 3/8/13, Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES To: "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan@unam.mx> Cc: "lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013, 4:58 PM
Dr. Pisanty:
Quizás me exprese mal y dije algo que no quise decir, aunque no creo haberlo hecho, en ningún momento defendí a José, ni defendí nada, lo único que expresé y que reitero, es mi molestia personal por los términos
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/684d0381ec.html --]]
participants (1)
-
apisan@unam.mx