[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS FW = iso-8859-1 == q = F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_los_estatutos_propu 3A_Declaraci = iso-8859-1 = q = F3n_con_el_Grupo_T E9cnico_ estos_cambios_en_relaci??? ? == Iso-8859-1? q? de_Enlace? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dev please two things: 1. Might Indicate clearly lime is the contradiction? 2 As it seems we do not understand your proposicin, I suggest posting a to confront the text we have already approved. Thank you very much and a hug Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of devtee@gmail.com Posted on: Wednesdays, December 4, 2013 2:08 pm To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS FW = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_los_estatutos_propu == 3A_Declaraci = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_con_el_Grupo_T = E9cnico_ estos_cambios_en_relaci????? ? == Iso-8859-1? q? de_Enlace? = [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] Subject: Re: = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS FW = iso-8859-1 == q = F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_los_estatutos_propu 3A_Declaraci = iso-8859-1 = q = F3n_con_el_Grupo_T E9cnico_ estos_cambios_en_relaci??? ? == Iso-8859-1? q? de_Enlace? = From: devtee@gmail.com Three things in my comment: 1) The declaration must be updated to say that does not support LACRALO eliminating the TLG liaison to the Board at this time, the changes that the true intention of the declaration. 2) The removal of the TLG liaision to the Board appointed by ETSI and W3C ITU-T on a rotating basis each aoa board is that much of a I expense? Given: - The proposed bylaw changes keeps the IETF liaison to the Board - The panel TLG keychain present to offer advice to the Board when requested by the Administration and Council to provide advice to the Board on a capacity "guardian dog". I think the elimination of the TLG liaision the Board was given the ok two ms reasons above and those wanted sealar out for those maintain that support the Board TLG link yet. 3) The proposed bylaw changes remove the delegate to TLG Comitde nominations.Given the concerns of who has in the Council with appropriate technique experience, not should support this change and TLG should still be able to select a delegate to integrate Comitde nominations. Dev Anand On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM <aidanoblia@gmail.com> wrote:

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Re: = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS FW = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_los_estatutos_propu == 3A_Declaraci = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_con_el_Grupo_T = E9cnico_ estos_cambios_en_relaci????? == iso-8859-1? q? de_Enlace? = From: aidanoblia@gmail.com

Forgiveness but it is not clear what is the last modification proposed by DEV.

Entendque the problem is given in the last paragraph of the declaration and especially with regard in particular to the speaker of the "elimination" of technician link.

Maybe you could modify this paragraph shall be as the deadline of 3 is internal and the other period is 5 had mentioned to have the definitive 6.

Especially perhaps could change the word "elimination" of the other ms reflect the situacina referring Dev, as also Alejandro he understood that there is reason in the situation posed Dev

This looking for a solution because if the rest of the declaration is est according guess maybe modifying this may eliminate contradiction.

If I'm able to forgive a mistake, is too complex a topic for my at this time and is certainly not the only one.

Regards

- Aida Noblia _______________________________________________

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/95baa26a92.html --]]