[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? VIEW = F3n_solicitados_a_la_comuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Dad_At-Large_en_los_comentarios_recibidos_sobre_la_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Objeci = F3n_de_solicitudes_de_gTLD_nuevos = 2E? = From: gmzamora@gmail.com Dear Not contribute much in other subjects, Perhaps because I feel that before talking I prefer to keep my mouth shut nonsense, in this specific topic, the. patagonia, I think I can speak with some property. - I trelewense (born in the city of Trelew), Chubut (province Chubut), patagnico (in the region patagnica) and Argentina in that order. - On July 28, 1865, a group of 153 Welsh come to the shores of Puerto Madryn (60 km from Trelew) on board the ship "Mimosa".Among themselves Venan landholders, miners, carpenters, blacksmiths, a tailor, my Great great grandfather named Morgan was one of the farmers who came in that ship, l daughter was my great grandmother Margaret Ann Morgan and her daughter was Jones Rihannon my grandmother, then my father Victor Antonio Zamora was his son. - On the side of my mother and my grandparents Roberts Price also came in Mimosa, Prudence Price and Thomas Roberts were my great-grandparents, daughter Viola Roberts bone them was my grandmother, mother Amanda them nacimi Peace Amelia and she and my father signed. - All but my mother and father's grandparents were born in Chubut and BY NSDS IN PATAGONIA, podrn imaginaarse for me to say is not PATAGONIA slo say an Internet domain or region, it is my proud descendants porcin land is identified me and gives me roots. - Dev thank notice, I understand the difficulty that people who do not feel this as their own, who knows these payments knows that immensity and Beauty is not even remotely comparable to a piece of cloth from a factory of clothing, PATAGONIA not identify the essence identifies adventure, soul, and roots, while the roots mentioned underground imagine me not would like these you can see the air or ether or virtual, lost in a company, whom, perhaps wielding sb commercial rights argument, but to be clear, we do not talk business case but aqude belongings of a bigger and deeper sense we speak of provinces Argentine / Chilean, of a portion of land full of history and people, people are not a number on the network. - The denomination Patagona belongs to its people, as part of the region his thousands of Caribbean people, allowing the companies feel property of an entity name and identity is removed, is giving a piece of our feeling, imagine for a moment if you call coke and Caribbean desired record. Caribbean if ... Anyway, I did not fill them their mail with personal issues, but I have no other way to understand this is personal, it is between them and we who inhabit the south of the continent south of the world, almost cayndonos map, so it is personal, because they defend and thinking will thus disrespecting the 153 bold almost 150 years, in a boat that size of a walnut cscara took to find a place to belong, and where they might belong, their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, great grandchildren and also my son who is trelewense, Chubut, and PATAGONICO ... Sorry this disgrecin, but a while ago I raised this to my province authorities without obtaining greater response than a simple banner on the official government site directs to nic.ar. .. bone anything. - Best regards from Chubut Patagonia Argentina, a patagnico of land waiting to be a patagnico Network - Ps can read some more about this in: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonizaci% C3% B3n_galesa_en_Argentina http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Jones William M. Zamora ADIAr. On January 26, 2013 11:16, <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

Asunto: Opinión solicitados a la comunidad At-Large en los comentarios recibidos sobre la objeción de solicitudes de gTLD nuevos. De: devtee@gmail.com

De acuerdo con el proceso por el cual el ALAC puede oponerse a un nuevo gTLD aplicación (ver PDF en http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD), En el nuevo Grupo de Revisión (RG gTLD) solicita a la opiniones de las la comunidad At-Large en los comentarios recibidos sobre el siguiente nuevo solicitudes de gTLD:

. Amazon ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG . Patagonia ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG . Nyc ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG . Salud ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG

Hasta la fecha, no hay suficientes comentarios por parte de la comunidad At-Large en estas aplicaciones para determinar si existe sustancial oposición, como se describe en la Sección 3.5.4 de la Guía para el Solicitante. Esta sección describe cuatro pruebas para el Servicio de Resolución de Disputas El proveedor de oír la objeción para determinar si hay oposición sustancial de una parte significativa de la comunidad para que la cadena puede ser dirigida. Para que una objeción para tener éxito, el objetor debe probar que:

* La comunidad invocada por el objetor es una comunidad claramente delimitada, y * Comunidad oposición a la solicitud es sustancial, y * Existe una fuerte asociación entre la comunidad invocada y la cadena de caracteres de gTLD, y * La aplicación crea un riesgo de perjuicio material a la derechos o intereses legítimos de una parte significativa de la comunidad a la que puede ser la cadena explícita o implícitamente.

Ver https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg criterios para motivos de objeción. Usted puede publicar sus opiniones sobre las páginas wiki vinculados a anterior, bien por visitando el Panel de nuevos gTLD en http://bit.ly/newgtld antes de la próxima conferencia llamada gTLD RG en 01 de febrero 2013

Saludos cordiales,

Dev Anand Teelucksingh silla RG gTLD _______________________________________________

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19e4734aa1.html --]]