[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: FW: R: outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications From: apisan@unam.mx Colleagues, discusin aquuna convey that takes place in the ALAC and has already been submitted to the attention of LACRALO on another occasion. I think we should pass it with information and organizational support from our representatives that for now remain in office, and without waiting for new ultimatum (structural) to develop ideas and express ourselves. In the case of. Health, Roberto Gaetano aqupor mentioned, can be useful to recover the discussions that took place on this gTLD when it was proposed by the Greeting World organization (WHO / WHO) in a previous round, the 2000 if I remember correctly. I am at your orders to retrieve items available to me. Regards Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Roberto Gaetano [roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com] Posted on: Tuesday, 19 February 2013 12:06 To: 'At-Large Worldwide' CC: 'Discussion At-Large for Europe' Subject: [At-Large] R: outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications Thanks, Dev, for the good work. That I believe the issue of. Health is important, and would like to see more discussion in the mailing lists and more Opinions to be voiced by At Large participants before a decision is taken by ALAC. As I have already posted in an Earlier message, the big concern I have That is the potential consumer confusion in a critical domain like public health. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a wide discussion going on about the "closed generic" TLD class, with a request for comments issued by ICANN (Http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13-en.htm) closing on 7 March. Michele Neylon, to name just one person to Well Known us, has already been active in pointing out the issue. Personally, I believe That the "closed generic" subject is very important, and deserves an ALAC policy position. That I believe That the same brand owners care about the protection of exert Their brands as TLDs have to be exerted by the Public Interest in Protecting the value of generic terms.In the same way That brands want to avoid consumer confusion generated by misuse of brand names, the Public Interest Represented by ALAC Should fight to avoid consumer confusion generated by misuse by private business of public resources like generic names. The. Health issue is just one case where this is more obvious, and the danger of misuse is higher Because the Consequences of the consumer confusion will be wider. Regards, Roberto

-----Messaggio originale----- Da: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Dev Anand Teelucksingh Inviato: sabato 16 febbraio 2013 22:31 A: afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: gTLD WG Oggetto: [At-Large] outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications

Members of the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) considered the comments from the At-Large community as of February 8 2013 regarding the applications for

.amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg), .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) .nyc (https://community.icann.org/x/CYJEAg)

None of the applications raised any limited public interest concerns (https://community.icann.org/x/QAkQAg)

gTLD RG members ranked each factor of the four tests for community objection grounds ((https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg) based on the comments and discussions. Based on these rankings, the following are the decisions by the gTLD RG:

Re: .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg): There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .amazon given that the "detriment" test for community objection grounds was not passed.

Re: .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .patagonia given that the "targeting" and tests for community objection grounds were not passed.

Re: .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) Objection statements on community grounds will be drafted for the applications for .health given that the four tests for community objection grounds were passed. The gTLD RG will attempt to put together the objection statements to the applications for .health in time for RALO around 22 February 2013.

Re: .nyc There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .nyc given the comments received as on February 8 2013 indicated that the initial objection concerns raised were being addressed. A late comment sent to the gTLD RG on 11 February 2013 was treated by the gTLD RG as being submitted too late for consideration.

Kind Regards,

Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/66f970316b.html --]]