Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??? = Iso-8859-1 == q 3A_Recom Solicitud_de_comentarios = iso-8859-1 q = endaciones_Grupo_de_Trabajo_Regiones_Geogr E1ficas =?
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??? = Iso-8859-1 == q 3A_Recom Solicitud_de_comentarios = iso-8859-1 q = endaciones_Grupo_de_Trabajo_Regiones_Geogr E1ficas =? From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dear Fatima, before taking to the Wiki I write here, because it is not a custom of many to go to it. The report is quite long and complicated to understand fully. To address the issue of geogrficas divisions, discussing early diversity at various points, but there are many differences: geogrficas, Culture, lingsticas ... ISO 3166 also cited for it to be taken as a basis, but immediately suggests that organizations and communities will be able apply for other geographic regions reasignacina According deem to their jurisdiction, which the ISO 3166 remain invalidated. Neither states that adopted this point if there will be any limitacina applications for a community who are LACRALO, ask to be reassigned to APRALO eg. Honestly, today is 28, a night in Argentina, and time is short reading. At least were the previous comments on the wiki from your management. Best and Happy Holidays! Greetings! Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Fatima Cambronero Posted on: by saturday, December 28, 2013 7:32 pm To: LACRALO Espaol Olivier Crpin-Leblond; tijani.benjemaa @ topnet.tn; Maureen Hilyard Moari Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Request for Comments: Recommendations Group Working Regions Geogrficas Dear, As they had advanced in an earlier post, is open to community feedback Recommendations Working Group Regions Geogrficas. In LACRALO habamos already discussed this issue in June this year barely publicel Final Report. I have taken these comments to the first draft was drawn from ALAC and is posted on the Wiki this link: http://goo.gl/giCgHt In that same link encontrarn the Final Report and the various notes have circulated about the topic. What this issue in the last meeting discutisobre ALAC and between those who work with the first draft, was to write a short note, including various comments that were received and Haban discussed so far, especially for those recommendations that could affect the At-Large community. This topic will be open for comment until 31 December. May make their comments directly on the Wiki or if they do here, I offer to take them to ALAC. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Fatima Cambronero - * Fatima * Cambronero Attorney-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @ facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es * Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: * http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5003dcd918.html --]]
participants (1)
-
asoto@ibero-americano.org