[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q ANUNCIO_VOTO = 3A_LACRALO_Votaci = C3 = B3n _ = = utf-8 q sobre_Moci = C3 = B3n_Propuesta_de_Alejandro_Pisanty _ / _ Vote _ = = utf-8 q de_LACRALO_Sobre_la_moci = C3 =???????? B3n_Propuesta_por_Alejandro _? = =? utf-8? Q? Pisanty? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dev regret your disappointment. You were present at the meeting where Alexander Pisanty introduced this motion and could have proceeded under Art. 9.1 and 9.2 of our Rules of Procedure, since we had language interpreter. But always we proceed with inclusive, so we proceeded to the vote in question, enabling greater participation of our ALS. This is a topic that requires the broadest possible participation, is known by all those involved in LACRALO and has been supported by all until now, no opposition, except yours. My disappointment regarding your observation, is that your "collaboration" within LACRALO is for only criticism, and mostly are not constructive, but that delay our action.It also prevents what we are all asking, our guide would trigger substantive issues. Cheers Alberto Soto -----Original Message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of devtee@gmail.com Posted on: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 7:57 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: AD VOTE: Vote on Proposed Motion LACRALO Alexander Pisanty / Vote LACRALO On the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty [[Translated text (en -> en) -]] Subject: Re: AD VOTE: Vote on Proposed Motion LACRALO Alexander Pisanty / Vote LACRALO On the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: devtee@gmail.com I'm still being very disappointed by Alberto Carassco Humberto Soto and in the performance of his duties as chairman and secretariat. According to Rule 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or submitted to a vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than two weeks, all participants working languages \u200b\u200bof the Assembly. This was not done. Can the motion was put into the wiki to comment? I will comment on the motion there, as there are going to suggest an amendment. Best Regards, Dev Anand The sea, July 28, 2015 at 7:00 PM, the ICANN At-Large Staff < staff@atlarge.icann.org> wrote:

== EN ==

Dear All,

Do you support Mr. Alejandro Pisanty’s motion? Formal Motion from Alejandro Pisanty:

a. LACRALO’s Chair and Secretariat shall do an Agenda with policy issues for discussion. b. The first 30 minutes of each monthly call shall be focused on debate of current ICANN public consultations.

* Yes * No * Abstain

== ES ==

Hola a todos,

¿Usted apoya la moción de Alejandro Pisanty?

a. que la Presidencia y la Secretaría hagan una agenda de temas de políticas para su discusión b. que los primeros 30' de cada sesión mensual se dediquen a temas sustantivos de debate de políticas en curso en consultas públicas de ICANN

*Si *No *Abstención

Regards,

Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b1e4ab254a.html --]]