Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN Board Seat
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ICANN Board Seat From: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com Dear, To clarify the Cuestin I'm going to say that the reply mail Alan was public and say that I personally am going to consult the region you want to do, maybe the internal discussion of the need for living a call (with one, some or all). Because I told you to consult with is performed several things that led to the erroneous discussion. As I said to Alexander, who wants to hear the region. Alan was the only candidate who was placed in direct contact with LACRALO members, but this does not mean to exclude others in a future exchange of ideas or questions. Now, if some of you were on the call of the candidates, that's fine (but not all had that opportunity), but my mission is to try to give equal opportunities to all members and perhaps many of those who did not want that option, I I can not dismiss it. Tomorrow is not with the candidates but to know the criteria that must be the "ideal" candidate. I repeat, we must provide opportunities for all members to access Direct (call) or indirect (mail or wiki) to interact with candidates. It is an important desicin which should and must take LACRALO be based on knowledge and argumentation positions only so the internal debate serel ms right, from my point of view. Regards JosArce -. 3/11/2014 18:10 GMT-03: 00 Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan@gmail.com> :
To be clear, I was not asking for a teleconference. In a discussion with José Arce, José suggested that I tell LACRALO members about me, and that is why I sent the message.
Google Traductor: Para que quede claro, yo no estaba pidiendo una teleconferencia. En una discusión con José Arce, José sugirió que le digo a los miembros de LACRALO sobre mí, y es por eso que envié el mensaje.
Alan
At 11/03/2014 04:17 PM, Fatima Cambronero wrote:
José, todos,
Yo no estoy entendiendo muy bien qué es lo que se está planteando, lo que me lleva a hacerme varias preguntas: ¿Por qué tendríamos una llamada sólo con Alan, que es uno de los candidatos, y no con los otros cuatro candidatos? ¿Por qué necesitamos una llamada adicional con un candidato, cuando ya hubo una llamada con todos los candidatos, mañana hay otra llamada y hay una Wiki que ha sido creada para poder hacerle preguntas a todos los candidatos?
Si lo que se está consultando es si queremos tener una llamada solamente con Alan, que es uno de los candidatos, no estoy de acuerdo. Considero que debemos escuchar a todos los candidatos por igual. Y si se está consultando si queremos tener una llamada adicional para LACRALO con todos los candidatos, personalmente no lo veo necesario. En la llamada que hay mañana hay interpretación al español, se puede participar allí y hacer las preguntas que se consideren apropiadas para dirigir el voto que luego emita el Chair de LACRALO en nombre de la región. Aunque si los demás miembros de LACRALO entienden que tener esta llamada adicional es necesario para emitir su opinión, adelante con ella.
Saludos cordiales, Fatima Cambronero
2014-03-11 17:03 GMT-03:00 <cveraq@gmail.com>:
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Asiento de junta de ICANN De: cveraq@gmail.com
Seria Llamada Una interesante y Oportuna
Carlos Vera Quintana 0988141143 Sígueme @ cveraq
El 11/03/2014, a las 14:49, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> escribió:
José,
buenos puntos de discusión. Oigamos a la comunidad.
Alejandro Pisanty
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, <josefranciscoarce@gmail.com>
wrote:
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Asiento de junta de ICANN De: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com
Estimado Alejandro,
Gracias por el Correo. Lo tuyo es Una propuesta? Consultaremos La
Misma un
la región y actuare conforne Recuerden Que Yo sin nada definio, Solo la región desiciones Tomar Florerias. Los Miembros Individuales no hay votantes hijo, Pero si el presidente en Nombre de la región, Casi lo Mismo. Solo Queda sable Si La región QUIERE Llamada Una Con Los postulados (QUIZAS Todos no Quieran), Alguna Otra propuesta o Simplemente discutiremos ESTO en la Lista.
Saludos
José Arce El 11 de marzo 2014 14:46, "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" < apisan@unam.mx> escribi:
José,
como se dice popularmente en México, "o todos coludos o todos rabones". ¿Con qué reglas o criterios, si no hay reglas escritas, piensas que se conduzcan las campañas hacia LACRALOb de los competidores de ALAC por el Asiento 15 del Board? Estas reglas tendrían que ser equitativas, transparentes, y concretas en cuanto al resultado ya que los miembros de LACRALO no somos votantes directos en esa elección.
Alejandro Pisanty
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________ Desde: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de José Francisco Arce [josefranciscoarce@gmail.com] Enviado el: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 05:37 Hasta: Alan Greenberg CC: LACRALO discussion list Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN Board seat
Dear Alan, all
Thanks for your kind email, and for let us know your general background. I will ask the region if they have questions or prefer a personal call with you to have direct contac, after review all the candidanceŽs profiles.
Kind regards
José Arce LACRALO Chair
2014-03-11 1:59 GMT-03:00 Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan@gmail.com :
> Dear colleagues, > > I apologize for not being able to write in both Spanish and English. > > The At-Large Board member cannot "represent" the ALAC or At-Large. Once > appointed, the director is there purely on his/her own. However, we were > given a seat on the Board to allow the issues relevant to users to be > factored into the debates. To do that, a person must be selected who can > best represent those interests. > > My ICANN history > > - 8 years as a volunteer to At-Large, 6 on the ALAC, 8 years as ALAC > Liaison to the GNSO. I have also held several leadership roles on the ALAC. > > - I have worked very hard to make At-Large respected within ICANN. > > - I have been the principal author of many of the statements issues by the > ALAC over the last 8 years demonstrating my understanding of the issues > important to At-Large. > > - Although I obviously do not agree with some ICANN participants, I have > developed good working relationships with people in many diverse areas of > ICANN. > > Professional background: > > - Over 30 years as a software developer and senior manager at McGill > University. > > - I was part of the small group that brought the Internet to Canada. > > - I have volunteered in a number of professional organizations prior to > ICANN, including being a Board member for the Internet Society. > > - I spent 6 years as a volunteer to the Internet Society working with and > then running their Network Training Courses for people from developing > countries. We trained people from over 140 countries who were instrumental > in bringing the Internet to their countries. Alumni include government > ministers, ICANN Board members and ICANN employees. Most countries in > Central America, South America and the Caribbean attended and courses in > Spanish were also run in South America. > > - After my retirement from McGill, I spent several years consulting on the > use of technology in developing economies (ICT4D), and worked in Africa, > South Asia and Central America. > > Strengths related to the Board position: > > - I have a very strong understanding of ICANN and its various components, > of At-Large, and of the needs of Internet users. > > - I have a proven ability to work with others, and to influence outcomes. > I am generally viewed as a thoughtful and articulate person, and I am in a > very strong position to enter the Board and immediately be effective. Three > of my references for my Expression of Interest for this Board position were > current or former ICANN Board members, and their endorsements speak well to > my ability to quickly become an effective Board member. > > - My background with both the ISOC training workshops and my ICT4D > consulting have made me acutely aware of the issues that are important in > the developing world. > > - I am free of any relationship with those who stand to make money off of > ICANN's decisions, and will not have any conflicts in carrying out my > mandate. > > - My track record of dedication (in both time and effort) to ICANN and > At-Large is well known, and I will put the same energy into presenting the > needs of users on the Board. > > I do not believe that any other candidate can match all of my > qualifications and I will not only be a good Board member, but an > outstanding At-Large Board member. > > If I am selected, I can make a number of commitments: > > - I promise to stay in touch with the ALAC, At-Large and RALOs, through > both face-to-face meetings and teleconferences. That is the only way to > ensure that I am aware of issues important to At-Large. > > - You will regularly hear from me about Board activities and my > participation, and raising issues that I believe that At-Large may want to > focus on. > > - I will work to make sure that the bottom-up nature of ICANN is preserved > in fact and not only in words. This is key to ICANN's ability to continue > to exist and meet its obligations. > > - While on the Board, I will work hard to increase its transparency, to > make sure that users issues are considered, and to ensure more > participation in ICANN from people who are not funded by companies and who > do not speak English. Both of these were important proposals that I fought > for in the ATRT2 Report (http://www.icann.org/en/ > about/aoc-review/atrt/final-recommendations-31dec13-en.pdf or > http://www.icann.org/es/about/aoc-review/atrt/final- > recommendations-31dec13-es.pdf, page 9-11, section 10.3 and 10.5) > > I will be happy to answer any questions. > > Regards, Alan > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
-- Arce, José F. http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/418b3c3493.html --]]
participants (1)
-
josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com