Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter From: aidanoblia@gmail.com I share the two proposals Vanda in that the Expert Independent must have a knowledge of the experiences in the different countries and not just a theoretical knowledge. Without knowing the context internal and idiosyncrasies of the people in each country will be very difficult have a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe real meaning of certain facts, actions and even words, since the same language is sometimes expressions or words can not be understood in context. I also agree with what was said about that experience is necessary ICANN, which is a very complex organism and requires time and dedication to meet him. I worry about the question of Carlos, I can not think response and I think an essential question. The fact that experts meet the conditions for office It will depend on what is established as requirements for appointment and also the criteria and methods that have nomination people that designate. Greetings to all. 11/25/2015 20:03 GMT-03: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg@isoc-cr.org> :
Gracias Vanda,
es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustaría saber QUIEN escoge al experto.
Saludos cordiales
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 (New Phone number!!!!) ________ Apartado 1571-1000 COSTA RICA
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
Estimados colegas
Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organización que deberá ser contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que están en la wiki acerca de:
1. el punto de diversidad que para mi es necesario que los expertos contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos países no solo clientes en estos países y 2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de experiencia en ICANN – participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectual… para mi debía tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de preferencia como simples atendente para una vision más amplia de todo el complejo de ICANN
Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios, en nuestra lista o en la WIKI. Abrazos *Vanda Scartezini* *Polo Consultores Associados* *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004* *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil* *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>* *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> * *So**rry for any typos. *
From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Staff Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM To: LACRALO list Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter
Dear All,
The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the At-Large Community for its Draft Charter: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background information below.
==
ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that time.
The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader community are important components of this review process.
As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee...> has requested that an At-Large Review Working Party <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities.
The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in its teleconference on November 23, 2015 <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open for comments from RALO members.* You may download and review the draft charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you don’t have a login or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact staff@atlarge.icann.org.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
Aida Noblia [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1b03d3047e.html --]]
participants (1)
-
aidanoblia＠gmail.com