[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = iso-8859-1 3A_Convocatoria_de_manifestacio == q R = iso-8859-1 == q E9s_para_el_Director_de_la_Junta_elegidos_por nes_de_inter = iso-8859-1 q = _at-Large_ahora_abrir_a_trav E9s_de_26_de_diciembre_2013?????? = From: johnnylaureano@yahoo.com Dear members of the At Large community I find excellent pre-process review, I just want to express about my position on a requirement Starring (informal) necessary for this representative arranges for formal Council bylaws ICANN, the NomCom and the At Large , as manifested by a prestigious member of the Community At Large. At this point, it is vital that aquellla person assuming the seat 15, in addition to knowing the creation and operational objectives of ICANN, must represent the interests of end users, the most fundamental way possible. I mention this because the other representatives of the board represent the interests of other sectors, as corresponds to the logic of players in this ecosystem.It is clear that the principle of consensus that promotes ICANN is not affected if everyone truly and consistently represents the interests of those who choose, in this case the end users of internet. My respects, Johnny Laureano AUI PERU -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 09/12/13, roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com> wrote: Subject: R: Call for expressions of interest for the Director of the Board elected by At-Large now open to Travs of December 26, 2013 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: "'ICANN At-Large Staff'" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> "'LACRALO discussion list'" <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Date: Monday, December 9, 2013, 24:08 [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] Subject: R: Call for expressions of interest to Director elected by the Board At-Large now open to Travs of December 26, 2013 From: roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com Dear Jos, First, I want to confirm what escribiTijani, ie we are talking seat on the Board # 15, no profile CEO ICANN. I agree with you that the word is not reflected the best option, while at the At the same time I think to understand a little too weak: MUST understand implement the views of all groups, not only about users. Perhaps it may be interpreted as a better option. Anyway, I think the point you make is important ms by general question, more than one choice word. This Cuestin about fiduciary responsibility of directors to all organization, and Not circunscripcin has appointed, has been a ongoing debate for many aos.Mientras Statutes establish clear first, I have no doubt that until the current mechanism for selection of Board members can especficas parts of the community to nominate their candidates will Ship to believe that these different parts of the community do not establish additional requirements for its candidates. For example, all the directors who have been selected by the GNSO have deep knowledge of the activities and interests of GNSO.Same for the Directors selected ccNSO and ASO. The fact that ALAC is the only component ICANN community with selecting Administration a process that is based pblica a call for applications should not end in the prevention of ALAC choose a candidate who has some experience Direct activities At-Large and give some guarantees to understand and interpret their needs. Hope that helps, Roberto Da: JosFrancisco Arce [mailto: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com] Inviato: marted3 dicembre 2013 15:37 A: Tijani Ben Jemaa (tijani.benjemaa @ planet.tn) Cc: ICANN At-Large, LACRALO discussion list; Roberto Gaetano Olivier Crepin-Leblond Oggetto: Re: CALL [lac-discuss-es] FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTERS by the Board Director selected by the At-Large and estabierto to Travs of December 26, 2013 Dear Tijiani, Thanks for the aclaracin, my doubt came from ignorance some issues happen before. If it is only for our seat 15 is logical to include this certain knowledge, but should not be taken as mandatory. The lines: member should be able to reflect the point of view and user interests the debate ... " maybe it has to be a change of "Member must be able to understand the point of view of users and interests ... " P by the time I take my bad english "Mirror" incorrectly But it sounds like you need some experience. For my view not experience is necessary. Best Regards Jos - 12/03/2013 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn> Dear Jos, When EOI (formerly IOS) was conceived for the first round of the ABSdt (I was a member), is diseel document to the Council Director selected by ALAC (seat 15), not for general case. In fact, takes the requirements used for the case General (ICANN Bylaws), we aadimos the Requirements used by NomCom to select a chairman of the board, then aadi requirements At-Large. This document is not for the general case, and for the selection of the director of the Council elected by ALAC only. -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ---- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Federation of Associations of Internet Mediterrnea (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ---- From: JosFrancisco Arce [mailto: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com] Posted: Tuesday, 3 dcembre 2013 12:13 : Tijani Ben Jemaa (tijani.benjemaa @ planet.tn) Cc: ICANN At-Large, LACRALO discussion list; Roberto Gaetano Olivier Crepin-Leblond Objet: Re: CALL [lac-discuss-es] FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTERS by the Board Director selected by the At-Large and estabierto to Travs of December 26, 2013 Thanks Tijiani by aclaracin. But I still think deberamos have 3 different expressions of interest, since if a deep knowledge of the community in general is a general requirement for be a member of the Board who may Do not imagine that all current menmber borad must supporting, and my point of view has to have it. It is a crazy to think that at the actual 3-categories Documment for be criticism. Perhaps Olivier can add something we are us losing. My 2 cents JosArce 02/12/2013 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn> Hello Jos, Sorry for the response takes. In fact, the EOI is BCEC duty, and this answer is a personal opinion. You know, the requirements that you mentioned was in 3 -categories: The requirements for board members in the ICANN bylaws The requirements for a member of the board used by Comitde Nominations And other requirements of At-Large I think what seemed like a contradiction to you is the result of the combination of the 3 categories. It is true that a board member should serve the benefit of ICANN as a whole, and not as a representative of a given groups of interest, but ALAC dont think appointing someone who knows nothing of end users concerns and interests. I think it's normal for the candidate must be very aware of the issues of At-Large. While selected, this Board Member actuarcomo an individual the benefit of ICANN, but with his / her background and knowledge of the At-Large community. My 2 cents -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ---- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Federation of Associations of Internet Mediterrnea (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ---- From: JosFrancisco Arce [mailto: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com] Sent: lundi 2 dcembre 2013 11:48 : ICANN At-Large Cc: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; Roberto Gaetano (Roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com); Tijani Ben Jemaa (tijani.benjemaa @ planet.tn); Olivier Crepin-Leblond Objet: Re: CALL [lac-discuss-es] FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTERS by the Board Director selected by the At-Large and estabierto to Travs of December 26, 2013 Dear Tijiani and Roberto, Any comments about my e-mail. S we are runing out of time, but I actually see contradictions in the text can confuse candidates and applicants. Best Regards JosArce 27/11/2013 JosFrancisco Arce <josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> Dear All, I've read the document and I have some questions: 1) Regarding the first paragraph shall: Member must be able to reflect point of view and interest in making and discussion decision Ratings undertaken in the context of ICANN. Both times LACRALO ÚLTIMAS hablsobre this issue, and \\ U200b \\ u200bel last was in Reunin of Buenos Aires, with Fatimas Question Sbastien Bachollet, the answer was the same: Once the candidate is elected, a member of the Board not the identification of a group, and not have to explain to community to vote for he / she, but the entire community. NMAs text included the requirement mentioned background in Interests of Internet users. If this is a especfico requirement? Or must be global requirements mechanics? And it seems that there a contradiction with the part: Quhace a Director of the Board of ICANN do? Serve as individuals who have duty to act in what they reasonably believe are the best interests of ICANN and not as representatives of the entity that seleccionsu employers or other organizations or groups; If this is my confusion, apologies pidilas corresponding. 2) Sque is controversial, but the third paragraph shall be defined as Esten-large, and I want to know if there is a consensus respect. Ill appreciate a aclaracin Best Regards JosArce 11/26/2013 ICANN At-Large <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Dear All, On behalf of Roberto Gaetano, President of the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee (BCEC), the call is attached expressions of interest to the Director of the Board elected At-Large (at English, francsy Espaol). The document contains a link to the application in line. Applications are aceptarn between November 26 and 26 December 2013 23:59 UTC. The Director of the Board of seat occupancy 15 will unite the ICANN Board in conclusion of ICANN 2014 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in October 2014. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia ICANN staff Charvolen Policy How to ALAC support E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge. icann.org% 3cmailto: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org>

...

_______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/aa0172e5f7.html --]]