closed public comment 24 MAR 17
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: closed public comment 24 MAR 17 Desde: asoto@ibero-americano.org Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the company. There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p then containing the recommendations is sixteen. The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft. Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document contains recommendations is sixteen. LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment. This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n on it. We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form. Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way making a general comment, not particularly about each RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our freedom of opinion. The link in question: < https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf Best regards Alberto Soto [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/434497edb8.html --]]
Dear Alberto, ALSes and At-Large members are encouraged to respond directly to the consultation by emailing: comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org The deadline for direct comments is 24 March 2017 23:59 UTC But the ALAC and the RALO leaders have also prepared comments obtained from consensus discussions. The drafts of these comments have been circulated already. The RALO comment has taken input directly from all RALOs including the work of the LACRALO working group and can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch... The ALAC Statement was drafted with several requests of input from the community and its latest draft is attached. I understand that now both Statements are frozen - i.e. finalised, except if someone points out a factual error. ALSes are encouraged to support the ALAC and the RALO Statements, but are also encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using the template. Kindest regards, Olivier On 23/03/2017 02:09, asoto@ibero-americano.org wrote:
Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the company.
There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p then containing the recommendations is sixteen.
The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft.
Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document contains recommendations is sixteen.
LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list.
As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually Be prepared to personal comments on both documents.
My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment.
This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n on it.
We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form.
Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way making a general comment, not particularly about each RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our freedom of opinion.
The link in question: < https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
On 23/03/2017 11:37, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
The ALAC Statement was drafted with several requests of input from the community and its latest draft is attached.
Ooops -- that is forthcoming in a few hours. A few last minute changes are to be made and the final draft will be presented. Kindest regards, Olivier
Thanks Olivier!! Kind regards alberto De: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl@gih.com] Enviado el: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 AM Para: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; asoto@ibero-americano.org Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] closed public comment 24 MAR 17 Dear Alberto, ALSes and At-Large members are encouraged to respond directly to the consultation by emailing: comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org <mailto:comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org> The deadline for direct comments is 24 March 2017 23:59 UTC But the ALAC and the RALO leaders have also prepared comments obtained from consensus discussions. The drafts of these comments have been circulated already. The RALO comment has taken input directly from all RALOs including the work of the LACRALO working group and can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch OPA/edit?usp=sharing The ALAC Statement was drafted with several requests of input from the community and its latest draft is attached. I understand that now both Statements are frozen - i.e. finalised, except if someone points out a factual error. ALSes are encouraged to support the ALAC and the RALO Statements, but are also encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using the template. Kindest regards, Olivier On 23/03/2017 02:09, asoto@ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote: Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the company. There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p then containing the recommendations is sixteen. The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft. Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document contains recommendations is sixteen. LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment. This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n on it. We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form. Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way making a general comment, not particularly about each RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our freedom of opinion. The link in question: < https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf -- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
participants (3)
-
Alberto Soto -
asoto＠ibero-americano.org
-
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond