Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: apisanty@gmail.com Hi, Does not Reflect the subject motion. This is not a vote on a motion I Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote Against It. It is remarkable Also That the person (s) who for no confidence did Moved not vote. The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion I It has encouraged. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as test my vote. It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the motion of Censorship did not vote. Alejandro Pisanty Alejandro Pisanty 18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> :
Dear All,
Please be so kind to note that the First Vote with regard to the Motion of No Confidence proposed by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was governed by rules *12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP*. Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question was asked in the First Vote:
***
*QUESTION:* Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of no confidence?
1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward.
2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored.
Of the total of 47 ALSs in this voting process, 28 ALSs voted (equivalent to 58,89% of total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALSs.
Option YES =7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of total weight.
Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of total weight.
Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of total weight.
According to rule 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall be regarded as having not voted.
As at Poll close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28· Group size: 47 · Percentage voted: 58.89 of total weight
Ranked by votes
*Rank*
*Options*
*Weighted Votes*
*%*
*Votes*
*%*
*Voters*
1
No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada
4,531.0000
76.87
21
75.00
Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125)
2
Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder
1,363.0000
23.13
7
25.00
Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500)
***
As per instruction published on the Next Steps regarding the Motion of No Confidence <https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, the proposed amendment and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored.
You may check the vote result independently under: <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q
== ES ==
Hola a todos,
Por favor notar que el primer voto sobre la moción de censura propuesta por el Sr. Carlton Samuels se ha completado. El proceso de voto estará gobernado por las reglas *12, 19, y 20* *de las Reglas de Procedimiento de LACRALO*. Con relación a la resolución propuesta, la siguiente es la pregunta del Primer voto:
***
*PREGUNTA*: ¿Usted cree que LACRALO tiene competencia para votar la moción de censura?
1. Si, la moción de censura debe proceder.
2. No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada.
Del total de 47 ALSes en este proceso de votación, 28 ALSes votaron (equivalente al 58,89% del peso total). El mínimo quorum requerido es 24 ALses.
Opción SI - 7 Votos equivalentes al 13,61% del peso total.
Opción NO - 21 Votos equivalentes al 45,28% del peso total.
Abstenciones al votar = 19 votos equivalentes al 41,11 % del peso total.
De acuerdo a la regla 12.2, las estructuras que se abstengan de votar se consideraran como si no hubieran votado.
Al momento de cerrar la votación: Viernes 16 de Octubre 2015, 23 UTC.
Número de votos: 28. Tamaño del grupo: 47. Porcentaje votado: 58.89 del peso total
Posición Opciones Votos
*Posición *
*Opciones*
*Votos tabuladas*
*%*
*Votos*
*%*
*Votantes*
1
No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada
4,531.0000
76.87
21
75.00
Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125)
2
Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder
1,363.0000
23.13
7
25.00
Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500)
***
De acuerdo a las instrucciones publicadas en los Siguientes pasos acerca de la moción de censura <https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, la enmienda propuesta y la moción de censura del Sr. Samuels será ignorada.
Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo: <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: <staff@atlarge.icann.org>staff@atlarge.icann.org
Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>www.facebook.com/icann atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d12fb5a474.html --]]
participants (1)
-
apisanty＠gmail.com