[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: Public Comment: Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures From: apisan@unam.mx Alberto, one of the points that have been consistently featured in this issue is the shortage of proposals for new gTLDs from developing countries. The discourse about it is usually exhausted in sealamientos about the high cost and long waiting of the application process. An alternative theory suggests that few investors interested estn developing countries in this highly speculative market and that business models based on forms of extortion as preventive domain name registrations abound. Many investors that just do not seem interesting and is one of the reasons why there are few requests, having other business to do in our regions. LACRALO should propose a careful study field that has a good experimental design.Ste is gifted deberinvestigar between funds and investors accustomed to high risks and long maturation of investments by QUNO have invested in this market, ascomo a few companies that s they have done. Some of the proposals from developing countries that were accepted were are developing well. I leave aside for the moment the community-based applications, which are scarce in the whole program of new gTLDs. Left above as a formal mocin from us. his is a good topic to extend the proposed development of policies based on facts that estexplorando the GNSO. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto [asoto@ibero-americano.org] Posted on: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 23:47 To: 'Len Felipe Sanchez Amba'; 'LACRALO'; 'LACRALO' Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC] Public Comment: Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Dear, is taken as a subject of debate. I ask you please, go take knowledge of the subject and gives 14.9.2015 will begin mailing list. In this way we can take thirty minutes and aprovecharmejor Prxima our monthly meeting. Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Len Felipe Sanchez Amba Posted on: Wednesdays, September 2, 2015 1:17 a.m. To: LACRALO <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; LACRALO <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC] Public Comment: Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Queridxs amigxs, Reenvo Carlton Samuels this message containing important information about the guidelines that should likely be followed in subsequent rounds of new gTLDs. Carlton as mentioned, it is important to review the procedures and especially in our region, we contribute to the paragraphs on passes going development. Ojalpodamos discuss the issue on the list and call our Prxima monthly. Cheers, Len Start of forwarded message: From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com<mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > Subject: [ALAC] Fwd: Public Comment: Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Date: September 1, 2015 10:49:35 GMT -5 To: "lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> " <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > At-Large Worldwide <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> >, "Gtld-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:gtld-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org> " <gtld-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:gtld-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > For Those of you who care About What Should happen in the event another round of gTLDs is forked by ICANN, esta Preliminary Issues Report on Subsequent Procedures would be very important. Also it to signal it is time for you to get engaged in esta process. I have read the Executive Summary and gone straight to the details of That Were matters of particular interest to me and in my estimation, the folks Whose interests I advocate; Developing country economies and social systems Where the Internet is social and economic development and acerca Could be our ultimate game changer. I hope my friend and our colleague Evan Leibovitch is taking note here too. For, Although I've Decreased His activities due to Changes in His Circumstances, His voice and consistent advocacy positions That impact for us still rings in my head on several of the matters raised in the Report. The domain name Largely market remains the province of the dominant economies. Largely developing economies are still excluded by one or other barriers, some of them finely tuned for preference and aided and abetted, consciously and unconsciously, by ICANN policies. The Report groups the matters in five (5) broad categories Which is quite useful in digesting. But speaking Directly To Those of us from developing economies and informed by my experience as Co-Chair of the Applicant Support Working Group in the last round, I urged you read closely the details of matters raised in: 4.2.3 - Competition, Consumer Trust and Choice 4.2.4 - Community Engagement 4.2.5 - Applicant Guide Book (AGB) 4.2.6 - Clarity of Application Process 4.2.7 - Application Accessed in Rounds 4.2.10 - Application Fees 4.2.11 - Communications 4.2.14 - Support for Applicants from Developing Countries 4.2.15 - Different Types TLD 4.2.17 - Variable Fees 4.3.5 - Register Discrimination 4.3.9 - Global Public Interest 4.4.5 - Community Applications You will find the report (en Inglés) here: http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-prelim-issue... Please Ensure if You have comments you record them in the areas provided by the At-Large or GNSO. Samuels -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= Dear All, This is to let you know That the Public Comment on the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures have now gone live: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31-... The dates of the Public Comment will be 31 August 2015 10 October 2015 23:59 UTC. During esta period, anyone can submit comment via comments-new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-31aug15@icann.org <mailto:comments-new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-31aug15@icann.org> . As an advisory committee of ICANN, the ALAC submits on Public Comment Statements and advises on policy matters related to the interest of Internet users worldwide. Not just limited to the 15 ALAC members, members from the wider At-Large community are welcome to draft a Statement on Behalf of the ALAC. If you are interested in drafting an ALAC Statement on Your Public Comment, kindly contact staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> . At-Large Staff will follow up and help you Understand the procedure. Additionally, the wiki workspace for Developing a potential ALAC Statement is here: https://community.icann.org/x/zIdYAw. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/010c0e071c.html --]]