FW: [ALAC] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews
Estimado Alberto Respecto el email de Rinalia , mi posición personal es la propuesta como esta es buena y aguardar para tener resultados del nuevo grupo a se formar por Competición, Escoja y Credibilidad para el Consumidor, por cierto va adicionar conocimiento sobre que demandas que ALAC debe cumplir para mejor atender la comunidad. Dear Alberto, Regarding Rinalia email below, my personal position is the proposed postponed document is good, and to wait for the results from "Competition, Consumer Choice & Consumer Trust Review² that certainly will add knowledge about all demands ALAC shall accomplish to better serve our community. Abrazos / Best regards Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: Rinalia Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 22:52 To: 'ALAC List' <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [ALAC] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews Dear ALAC & RALO Chairs, I know that it is a busy time, but please do provide comments on whether the proposed slower pace of At-Large Review 2 is agreeable or if further adjustments are needed to ensure sufficient time and capacity for the At-Large community to do a meaningful review towards enhancing At-Large effectiveness and relevance. Comments on other aspects of ICANN reviews as raised in the call for Public Comments would also be appreciated. Best regards, Rinalia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: May 20, 2015 12:38 AM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: Dear All, Kindly note that the At-Large Workspace for this new public comment period has been created: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews <https://community.icann.org/x/-440Aw> . Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge> Twitter: @ICANN_AtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge> _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C)
Vanda, considero que el ALAC Review debe ser realizado pronto y con preguntas sumamente incisivas acerca de la efectividad de ALAC y las distinas RALOs, acerca de la transparencia y rendición de cuentas de las organizaciones miembros, la eficaz representación de los usuarios de Internet, y acerca de sus contribuciones sustantivas al desarrollo de las políticas de ICANN. Esto es especialmente importante en LACRALO ya que no hemos podido avanzar con las métricas para estos fines y por ello tampoco hemos avanzado en la conceptualización de los términos referidos. El reordenamiento de los reviews en su conjunto es un tema mayor que debemos tratar por separado. Nuestra posición es que los reviews deben ser más concisos y efectivos, y que se requiere alargar los ciclos y aumentar la coordinación de los distintos tipos de reviews. Una revisión de los beneficios, costos y consecuencias inesperadas de los reviews es imprescindible y urgente. Alejandro Pisanty On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@uol.com.br> wrote:
Estimado Alberto Respecto el email de Rinalia , mi posición personal es la propuesta como esta es buena y aguardar para tener resultados del nuevo grupo a se formar por Competición, Escoja y Credibilidad para el Consumidor, por cierto va adicionar conocimiento sobre que demandas que ALAC debe cumplir para mejor atender la comunidad.
Dear Alberto, Regarding Rinalia email below, my personal position is the proposed postponed document is good, and to wait for the results from "Competition, Consumer Choice & Consumer Trust Review” that certainly will add knowledge about all demands ALAC shall accomplish to better serve our community.
Abrazos / Best regards
*Vanda Scartezini* *Polo Consultores Associados* *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004* *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil* *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253* *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 * *So**rry for any typos. *
From: Rinalia Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 22:52 To: 'ALAC List' <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [ALAC] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews
Dear ALAC & RALO Chairs,
I know that it is a busy time, but please do provide comments on whether the proposed slower pace of At-Large Review 2 is agreeable or if further adjustments are needed to ensure sufficient time and capacity for the At-Large community to do a meaningful review towards enhancing At-Large effectiveness and relevance.
Comments on other aspects of ICANN reviews as raised in the call for Public Comments would also be appreciated.
Best regards,
Rinalia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: May 20, 2015 12:38 AM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc:
Dear All,
Kindly note that the At-Large Workspace for this new public comment period has been created: Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews <https://community.icann.org/x/-440Aw> .
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge Twitter: @ICANN_AtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge>
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
participants (2)
-
Alejandro Pisanty -
Vanda Scartezini