[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = utf-8 q Respuesta_a_preguntas_para_elecci = = utf-8 q = C3 = B3n_de_ALAC_Member =???????? From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Alexander, I remember the answer: "We discussed the possibility of including this requirement, but can not find any explicit reference in the Principles or operational ROPS. In addition, each candidate must complete his Statement of Interest (SOI), where you can see if there is any conflict of interest. In short, it will be left to the judgment of each voter if any candidate has a conflict of interest or not. We think that in the future we must explicitly include a rule regulating this issue in our organizational documents. " As you can see, we have no rule about it. Nor we have standards to specify your order of election commission. But we have no more time to delay this election.If we do so for any reason, it is likely that whoever is appointed, can not travel to Dublin to take charge. We have already lost too much time, and I say lost because there was delay orders for discussion, and no one raised the requested topics, so we took the previous two and proceeded accordingly. Even some raised privately generate a document, and privately replied that if they wanted, they pose to the list, but did not. There will be an interview with the candidates or, and every ALS can think freely about it, and then make your decision. Cheers Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty Posted on: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:26 pm To: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Answer questions for election ALAC Member Humberto and Alberto, adversarial encounter this message on the conflict of interest, particularly among let it be decided by the voters and the statement you make about it.: How do you and Albert determined that the candidate reference is not prevented? I note that there are still outstanding issues to clarify and you. Esttán public and making the call. I submit for the consideration of all the possibility that the election is conducted by an appropriately integrated and empowered electoral commission, and posiblementte cuentte with support and supervision of the bodies authorized to do better.Then we can see if there is a chance they start to create conditions to conceive a scenario among its options are built to reach the deal with substantive issues that should occupy. Nothing is possible that we are routing to another round of intense and feverish energy application but they are not being oriented in a productive direction. Let's start with the first question would turn it around her subsequent choices. Maybe a detailed explanation of its determination convincing and can proceed to the following; as well will cause precedent, it is both desirable that be clear. Alejandro Pisanty 08/12/2015 2:54 GMT-05: 00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com> >: Dear, Through this email we respond to your questions and comments dated 06/08/2015 announced for the election to replace ALAC Member Fatima Cambronero election process. We resume the call with the respective corrections promptly. Cheers 1. The questions of Antonio Medina: This process is for initiating the "selection" or "choice" of Lacralo representative to the ALAC? Choice- Party as if it had been nothing before. Lance Hinds is an accredited delegate of ALS? That's right, Your ALS is DEVnet of Guyana. For this new process for some reason, Lance Hinds this prevented? Not prevented. If so there is a statement about this? If not you may be nominated? It may be nominated There are other ALS's impaired or representatives of ALS's disabled and can not be nominated? Only Brazil and Mexico as will be discussed in the call. Is there anything else we should know in advance to avoid repeating situations such as those recently acontecidas? It will be said in the call. 2. At the request of Alexander Pisanty Alejandro said that the previous edition left a contentious issue that gave rise to controversy in the recently suspended voting process, "the determination of eligibility of the candidates, particularly in this case the determination of possible impairment by conflicts of interest unsolvable" We have analyzed the possibility of incorporating this requirement, but we find no explicit reference in operating principles or in the RoP. In addition, each candidate must complete the Statement of Interest (SOI) from which can be released if the judgment of the voters there is any conflict of interest. In short, it is left to the judgment of the voters determine whether a candidate has or not a conflict of interest. We believe that in the future we will incorporate an explicit rule governing this issue in our organizational documents. 3. At the request of Fatima Cambronero Fatima said in summary that there were two errors in the communication sent. The first, excluding Argentina nationality for a possible candidacy and the computation of the time was running days (natural) and not business days. On the first point, we were discussing and understand that although the rule is not absolutely clear about this, we will adopt the interpretation indicated by Fatima and therefore may be someone from Argentina candidate nationality. On the issue of deadlines, deadlines to be (natural) calendar days and the call will be modified in this regard remain unchanged. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4660fb0e09.html --]]