Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela Harold arches Internauta
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela Harold arches Internauta From: devtee@gmail.com Since the call with the candidates yesterday, I am still puzzled that a person, Harold arches Internauta Venezuela than ever learned in LACRALO At-Large or until the end of July 2015, has not attended a F2F meeting of ICANN, not meet the requirements of ALAC it is serious It is considered as a candidate to represent LACRALO ALAC level represent the interests of Internet users in Latin America and Caribbean. ALAC requirements as its RP, as Jacqueline published in the list http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-August/013266.h... http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-es/2015-August/029233.h... mentions the following "D) Demonstrated capacity for thoughtful group decision-making and good judgment, and a history of working to build consensus with diverse set of interests working together on policy issues complex. e) The effective capacity chairing meetings and providing leadership and support teams or committees. g) In accordance with the recent recommendations of the review of the ALAC adopted by the ICANN Board, ALAC should have proficiency in spoken and written English for the committee work so ALAC effective and allow Members to engage effectively in the environment General ICANN. " As a newcomer to At-Large, Harold can not talk to these requirements. In yesterday's call, Harold mentioned in the call You can spend 5 hours a month to ALAC and this is the lack of time according with ALAC requirements document that requires a minimum of 20 hours per month, excluding hours F2F ICANN meeting.Moreover, a candidate must to add an additional average of 10 hours per month for GT as At-Large It indicated in the requirements document ALAC. I can not blame Harold for not knowing this because it is a newcomer, but this lack of knowledge and experience goes against what being Harold ALAC member and need more time to learn more about and participate in At-Large. Some other questions that come out of yesterday's call: - The representative of Venezuela Internauta is Sergio Bronstein. It is Harold Arcos ELA representative Internauta Venezuela? If so, when this change occurred? Best regards, Dev Anand [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/47c9c00df3.html --]]
If this is so, what makes this process legitimate? Certainly not as legitimate as the first process? It means that LACRALO rejected a legitimate process to stage an illegitimate one? Have to wonder about the intentions, objectives and goals of ICANN and its multi-stakeholder process. How could injustice be so blatantly allowed? How could the ombudsman be used to perpetrate such injustice? Exactly what is ICANN? They say a society can be judged by the way they treat their elderly... well ICANN will certainly be judged by how it treats its minorities. It boggles the mind... What is a multi-stakeholder process if it smothers minorities? ROK -----Original Message----- From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of devtee@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 03 September 2015 17:56 To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela Harold arches Internauta [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Some thoughts and questions regarding Venezuela Harold arches Internauta From: devtee@gmail.com Since the call with the candidates yesterday, I am still puzzled that a person, Harold arches Internauta Venezuela than ever learned in LACRALO At-Large or until the end of July 2015, has not attended a F2F meeting of ICANN, not meet the requirements of ALAC it is serious It is considered as a candidate to represent LACRALO ALAC level represent the interests of Internet users in Latin America and Caribbean. ALAC requirements as its RP, as Jacqueline published in the list http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-August/013266.h tml http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-es/2015-August/029233.h tml mentions the following "D) Demonstrated capacity for thoughtful group decision-making and good judgment, and a history of working to build consensus with diverse set of interests working together on policy issues complex. e) The effective capacity chairing meetings and providing leadership and support teams or committees. g) In accordance with the recent recommendations of the review of the ALAC adopted by the ICANN Board, ALAC should have proficiency in spoken and written English for the committee work so ALAC effective and allow Members to engage effectively in the environment General ICANN. " As a newcomer to At-Large, Harold can not talk to these requirements. In yesterday's call, Harold mentioned in the call You can spend 5 hours a month to ALAC and this is the lack of time according with ALAC requirements document that requires a minimum of 20 hours per month, excluding hours F2F ICANN meeting.Moreover, a candidate must to add an additional average of 10 hours per month for GT as At-Large It indicated in the requirements document ALAC. I can not blame Harold for not knowing this because it is a newcomer, but this lack of knowledge and experience goes against what being Harold ALAC member and need more time to learn more about and participate in At-Large. Some other questions that come out of yesterday's call: - The representative of Venezuela Internauta is Sergio Bronstein. It is Harold Arcos ELA representative Internauta Venezuela? If so, when this change occurred? Best regards, Dev Anand [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/47c9c00df3.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
participants (2)
-
devtee＠gmail.com -
Roosevelt King